2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
306
0
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
306
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…(Boyne, 2002;Cope and Goodship, 2002). They have subsequently been extensively modified with efforts being made to reduce these problems.…”
Section: What Is Auditing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Boyne, 2002;Cope and Goodship, 2002). They have subsequently been extensively modified with efforts being made to reduce these problems.…”
Section: What Is Auditing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have subsequently been extensively modified with efforts being made to reduce these problems. There are, however, still substantial concerns expressed about the quality of the information collected and how accurate a picture is conveyed of the service provision (Boyne et al, 2002;Cope & Goodship, 2002). A more detailed examination of the adequacy of the indicators will be made after discussing the challenges posed in making social work accountable.…”
Section: What Is Auditing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Customer satisfaction is one of the factors that contribute to the quality of the goods or services delivered [2] and considered one of the indicators for public service performance measurements [3]. Besides that, customer satisfaction measurement is used to improve the quality of goods or services that will contribute to the competitive advantage of the organization [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literatures regarding the conceptualization and measurement of organizational performance in public sector were written by experts (Ammons 2001;Carter, Day, andKlein 1992, in Boyne 2002). Reviewing the literatures, Boyne (2002) identified "headline" of dimension of service performance: quantity of outputs (e.g., the number of surgeries performed in hospitals, hours of teaching delivered in schools, the number of houses built), quality of outputs (e.g., speed and reliability of service, courtesy of staff), efficiency (financial ratio of outputs and inputs), equity (fairness of the distribution of service costs and benefits between different groups), outcomes (e.g., percentage of pupils passing exams, percentage of hospital patients treated successfully), value for money (cost per unit of outcome), consumer satisfaction (which may be a proxy for some or all of the above, depending on the questions posed to service users). According to Zeithaml, Parasuraman & Berry (1990), there are 10 benchmarks of services, namely: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, competence, courtesy, credibility, assurance, access, communication, and understanding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%