Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment

Abstract

Background and purpose Supine computed tomography scanogram (CTS) is a commonly used alternative to weight bearing long leg plain radiograph (LLR) in measuring knee alignment. No published studies have validated its use in the native knee and the post-unicompartmental replacement knee (UKR). We quantified the difference in measurements obtained from CTS and LLR for knee alignment.Patients and methods Supine CT scanograms and weight bearing long leg plain anteroposterior radiographs were obtained for 40 knees (in 25 patients), 17 of which were native, and 23 of which were post-UKR. The mechanical and anatomical axes of the tibio-femoral joint were measured. Bland-Altman plots were used to calculate the 1.96 standard deviation limits of agreement between CTS and LLR. Intraclass correlation was used to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (where values > 0.81 indicate very good reliability).Results CTS and LLR were equally reliable in measurement of the mechanical and anatomical axes of the tibio-femoral joint (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.9 for all parameters). Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences were found between CTS and LLR in measurement of the mechanical axis (limits of agreement: UKR −3.2° to 6.3°; native −3.2° to 5.6°) and the anatomical axis (limits of agreement: UKR −3.7° to 8.7°; native −2.0° to 8.8°).Interpretation Although it is a reliable tool, CTS is not necessarily an accurate one for measurement of knee alignment when compared to LLR. We recommend that CTS should not be used as a substitute for LLR in measurement of the mechanical or anatomical axes of the knee.

Accuracy assessment of surgical planning and three-dimensional-printed patient-specific guides for orthopaedic osteotomies

“…29,39,40 Most studies report on accuracy of implant positioning or leg alignment on two-dimensional (2D) X-rays as commonly used in clinical practice. However, this method has been criticized because of high inter- and intra-observer variability and therefore low clinical utility and reproducibility compared to CT. 36 Furthermore, poor accuracy assessment of tibial component orientation has been reported 41 with X-ray compared to CT-based 3D models. The latter is reported to be a valid technique for accuracy assessment of implant positioning, 42 and therefore nowadays the best measurement tool when reporting on accuracy of PSGs.…”

Can the Apex of Tibial Tubercle Represent the Insertion of Patellar Tendon in Measurement of Quadriceps Angles? Imaging Verification

“…Anatomically, the PT inserts on the TT to aid extension of the knee. The anatomic alignment of the knee is 5 o -7 o valgus and the TT is more laterally located [3,4]. If the patella is not laterally subluxed, a normal Q-angle is reported of 8 o -20 o in clinical measurement [18].…”

Surgical Accuracy of an Early Intervention Knee Implant Instrumentation System

“…10 It is now recognized that long-leg radiographs are needed where the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia can be determined with reasonable accuracy, although there is still some potential error depending on the axial rotation of the femur affecting apparent neck length. 16 Using long-leg radiographs, both overall alignment and component-bone alignments have been measured. [17][18][19] One parameter where there is considerable individual variation is the posterior tibial slope, as measured from CT scans.…”