2016
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/20373.8788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…12,22,23 To study the performance of the instruments examined through the whole canal length, the analysis of three different canal levels-apical, middle, and coronal levels, represented by 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex, respectively, was performed. 21,24,25 The results of this study showed that at the middle and the coronal levels, there was no significant difference between the four groups in canal centering ratio or the amount of canal transportation. However, at the apical level, WaveOne Gold files showed the best centering ratio and the least amount of canal transportation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…12,22,23 To study the performance of the instruments examined through the whole canal length, the analysis of three different canal levels-apical, middle, and coronal levels, represented by 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex, respectively, was performed. 21,24,25 The results of this study showed that at the middle and the coronal levels, there was no significant difference between the four groups in canal centering ratio or the amount of canal transportation. However, at the apical level, WaveOne Gold files showed the best centering ratio and the least amount of canal transportation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…18 Schäfer et al 19 compared the efficacy of shaping simulated curved canals using M two ®, K3®, and Race® files, and concluded that the M two instruments prepared curved canals more quickly, respecting their original curvature, but the number of fractured instruments was greater than with the Race and K3 systems. Recently, Shivashankar et al 20 reported similar findings regarding dentin volume removed and canal transportation in the preparation of mesial molar canals with the M two , ProTaper, and Protaper NEXT systems.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Nickel-titaniummentioning
confidence: 69%
“…While, the second and third levels were established at 6 and 9 mm representing critical levels at middle and coronal thirds respectively that are prone to stripping (16) . The apical preparation was completed to F2 file (0.25 tip size) as it has been reported that, the amount of canal transportation increases with apical preparation larger than # 25 (19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%