2020
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.38395.1201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of CBCT, Digital and Conventional Radiography in Evaluating the Shaping Performance of a Novel NiTi Rotary System ( An in Vitro Study)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, EdgeFile system had an Effect of Different Contemporary Rotary Nickel Titanium Systems on Root Canal Geometry (533) outstanding capability in shaping curved canals than other rotary systems. The file metallurgy and design features could be responsible for these findings which were consistent with previous reports (17)(18)(19)(20) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, EdgeFile system had an Effect of Different Contemporary Rotary Nickel Titanium Systems on Root Canal Geometry (533) outstanding capability in shaping curved canals than other rotary systems. The file metallurgy and design features could be responsible for these findings which were consistent with previous reports (17)(18)(19)(20) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The comparison of means from different measurements was commonly used for the evaluation of accuracy between different methods [3,11]. The results from these two studies revealed that there were significant differences between the means from different methods of evaluation, preventing further comparisons among the methods [3,11]. The result of the present study revealed that there was an agreement between both methods using periapical digital radiography and CBCT in the evaluation of root canal transportation with the same levels of investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The comparison of means from different measurements was commonly used for the evaluation of accuracy between different methods [3,11]. The results from these two studies revealed that there were significant differences between the means from different methods of evaluation, preventing further comparisons among the methods [3,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation