Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in:Neuroradiology 58.5 (2016) In an adjusted model, baseline CTA-SI-ASPECTS was inversely related to the odds of futile recanalization (OR 0.5; 95 % CI 0.3-0.7), whereas NCCT-ASPECTS was not (OR 0.8; 95 % CI 0.5-1.2). A score ≤5 in CTA-SIASPECTS was the best cut-off to predict futile recanalization (sensitivity 35 %; specificity 97 %; positive predictive value 86 %; negative predictive value 77 %).Conclusions CTA-SI-ASPECTS strongly predicts futile recanalization and could be a valuable tool for treatment decisions regarding the indication of revascularization therapies.Keywords Ischemic stroke . CT-angiography .
IntroductionEarly recanalization of the occluded vessel is crucial in improving the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke. However, despite achieving successful and prompt . However, the usefulness of this score for treatment decisions has been debated as it has modest inter-rater reliability, and the majority of recent trials of MT excluded patients with poorer baseline ASPECTS score [6]. ASPECTS on CT angiography source images (CTA-SIASPECTS) has been shown to be a more accurate predictor of outcome and final infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke [7,8]. CTA is recommended for the assessment of site of occlusion and vessel anatomy of acute stroke patients who are potential candidates for endovascular treatment [9], CTA data being available in the majority of these patients during their initial evaluation. The aim of this study is to assess whether baseline CTA-SI-ASPECTS might help predict response to treatment and can reliably predict futile recanalization in patients undergoing reperfusion therapies; the intention being to find a reliable tool for treatment decision making.