2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-297-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Surface and Roundness Metrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 presents the evaluation results concerning the cylindricality errors of the shafts, which were evaluated by using a Gaussian filter with a cut-off of 150 UPR (undulations per revolution). 39 The evaluation results of cylindricity errors on the journal bearing working surface of the six shafts were 1.50, 0.91, 1.39, 1.38, 2.76, and 2.28 μm, respectively. It can be observed that the cylindricity error values of shafts 1-4 are relatively small, all within 1.50 μm, while the cylindricity error values of shafts 5 and 6 range between 2 and 3 μm.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processing Of Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Figure 5 presents the evaluation results concerning the cylindricality errors of the shafts, which were evaluated by using a Gaussian filter with a cut-off of 150 UPR (undulations per revolution). 39 The evaluation results of cylindricity errors on the journal bearing working surface of the six shafts were 1.50, 0.91, 1.39, 1.38, 2.76, and 2.28 μm, respectively. It can be observed that the cylindricity error values of shafts 1-4 are relatively small, all within 1.50 μm, while the cylindricity error values of shafts 5 and 6 range between 2 and 3 μm.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Processing Of Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As many of these parameters were shown to be correlated with one another, only a few independent parameters were analyzed more in depth. 21 , 31 , 32 , 33 These were the average surface roughness and surface waviness , the surface polarity skewness and , and the waviness peak to valley height, . These parameters are explained in more detail in the Appendix A .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, roughness measurement parameters were calculated for the height data along each segment as characterization measures. The amplitude roughness parameters can be defined in terms of the probability distribution of the heights throughout the surface [29,30]. The standard deviation of heights (STD) was assessed by using the following equation:…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Characterization Of The Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%