2016
DOI: 10.1115/1.4034591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling and Online Monitoring of Aerosol Jet Printing Process

Abstract: The objectives of this paper in the context of aerosol jet printing (AJP)—an additive manufacturing (AM) process—are to: (1) realize in situ online monitoring of print quality in terms of line/electronic trace morphology; and (2) explain the causal aerodynamic interactions that govern line morphology based on a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (2D-CFD) model. To realize these objectives, an Optomec AJ-300 aerosol jet printer was instrumented with a charge coupled device (CCD) camera mounted coaxial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to materials and structural optimization, the process parameters should be adjusted and optimized to manufacture scaffolds with desired attributes. Numerous studies investigated the effect of process parameters on different responses such as mechanical properties (strength, elongation, Young's modulus), surface roughness, resolution and dimensional accuracy, and printing quality in different techniques including SLA [221][222][223][224], SLS [225][226][227][228][229][230][231][232][233][234], EBM [235][236][237][238][239][240][241], LENS [242,243], SLM [39,[244][245][246][247][248][249][250], 2PP [251][252][253], FDM [254][255][256], MJ [257,258], AJP [259][260][261][262], and IJP [263]…”
Section: D Printing Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to materials and structural optimization, the process parameters should be adjusted and optimized to manufacture scaffolds with desired attributes. Numerous studies investigated the effect of process parameters on different responses such as mechanical properties (strength, elongation, Young's modulus), surface roughness, resolution and dimensional accuracy, and printing quality in different techniques including SLA [221][222][223][224], SLS [225][226][227][228][229][230][231][232][233][234], EBM [235][236][237][238][239][240][241], LENS [242,243], SLM [39,[244][245][246][247][248][249][250], 2PP [251][252][253], FDM [254][255][256], MJ [257,258], AJP [259][260][261][262], and IJP [263]…”
Section: D Printing Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While AJP provides significant versatility from its compatibility with a broad range of materials, consistency and reproducibility are challenges that need to be overcome. For experienced users, optimizing print parameters to mitigate these challenges can require extreme measures which include, but are not limited to, frequent replacement of ink and extensive time spent towards empirical optimization for this sensitive process 21,23,35,37,38 .…”
Section: Printed Csg Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the aforementioned unique advantages and the broad range of applications engendered by AJP, the process is highly unstable, complex, and prone to gradual drifts in machine behavior, leading to suboptimal (and sometimes unsatisfactory) material deposition and device fabrication [21,22]. Formation of overspray (and satellite particles), deposition of lines with discontinuous edges, excess generation of aerosols, and inconsistent flow collimation are examples of adverse phenomena, which cause a deviation from optimal regimes in AJP process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a great extent, changes in material formulation and properties are the leading cause of the AJP process complexity. The fluctuation of material properties stems from, for example, ink temperature instability as well as solvent evaporation, leading to ink predrying and/or particle accumulation within the deposition head [22,23]. Consequently, implementation of physics-driven in situ process monitoring and control in the AJP process is inevitably a need.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation