“…In the case of GC Â GC, the latter is a fast gas chromatograph, in which the sub-samples are separated along an independent secondary elution time axis; in GC-MS, the mass spectrometer subjects the sub-samples to fragmentation, and separates the generated fragments along a secondary m/z axis. The main difference between the two methods consists in the fact that in GC-MS, a single compound can produce several m/z signals, whereas only a single retention time signal is produced in GC Â GC (Phillips & Xu, 1995). Several years later, a simulated GC Â MS chromatogram was compared to that of a hydrocarbon GC Â GC chromatogram (Schoenmakers et al, 2000), whereas very recently, GC Â time-of-flight (ToF) MS diesel chromatograms have been generated by using soft ionization methodologies (Wang, Qian, & Green, 2005;Mitschke, Welthagen, & Zimmermann, 2006).…”