1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00297-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive multi-dimensional gas chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of GC Â GC, the latter is a fast gas chromatograph, in which the sub-samples are separated along an independent secondary elution time axis; in GC-MS, the mass spectrometer subjects the sub-samples to fragmentation, and separates the generated fragments along a secondary m/z axis. The main difference between the two methods consists in the fact that in GC-MS, a single compound can produce several m/z signals, whereas only a single retention time signal is produced in GC Â GC (Phillips & Xu, 1995). Several years later, a simulated GC Â MS chromatogram was compared to that of a hydrocarbon GC Â GC chromatogram (Schoenmakers et al, 2000), whereas very recently, GC Â time-of-flight (ToF) MS diesel chromatograms have been generated by using soft ionization methodologies (Wang, Qian, & Green, 2005;Mitschke, Welthagen, & Zimmermann, 2006).…”
Section: Comprehensive Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography In Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of GC Â GC, the latter is a fast gas chromatograph, in which the sub-samples are separated along an independent secondary elution time axis; in GC-MS, the mass spectrometer subjects the sub-samples to fragmentation, and separates the generated fragments along a secondary m/z axis. The main difference between the two methods consists in the fact that in GC-MS, a single compound can produce several m/z signals, whereas only a single retention time signal is produced in GC Â GC (Phillips & Xu, 1995). Several years later, a simulated GC Â MS chromatogram was compared to that of a hydrocarbon GC Â GC chromatogram (Schoenmakers et al, 2000), whereas very recently, GC Â time-of-flight (ToF) MS diesel chromatograms have been generated by using soft ionization methodologies (Wang, Qian, & Green, 2005;Mitschke, Welthagen, & Zimmermann, 2006).…”
Section: Comprehensive Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography In Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive two dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is ideal for the analysis of diesel, since high peak capacities (in terms of chromatographic separation) can be obtained 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GC×GC-TOFMS system may also be operated in the 1D mode by deactivating the thermal modulator. The functions of the thermal modulator have been described elsewhere [8,27,[31][32][33]. Data was continuously acquired by the high speed detector (TOFMS) 8 Chromatography Research International and deconvoluted by commercially available software (ChromaTOF), that came with the instrument, which generated contour plots, as well as three-dimensional chromatograms, based upon the user defined modulation period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC×GC is a relatively new technique [27], yet to be adapted by the CLP program. Since its inception, many researchers have published reviews and experimental results for a variety of complex samples using GC×GC -ECD or GC×GC-µECD, and more recently GC×GC-TOFMS [8,20,21,24,28,29], due to the complex nature of a single run in the 2D chromatographic separation method, their studies have not sufficiently resulted in the transfer of the 2D-GC technology to the commercial industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%