2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite of porous starch-silk fibroin nanofiber-calcium phosphate for bone regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the porosity of the material may play an important role in the water uptake; the substitute is considered a non-porous material, but the ionic exchange with the medium provokes its degradation and the formation of micro-porosities that allow water uptake [6,49]. Furthermore, our water uptake values were lower compared to those obtained in other studies on materials made of fibroin and calcium phosphates, which are usually between 42% and 70% [46,47].…”
Section: Characterization Of Sf/nha Substitutes 1) In Vitro Degradcontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the porosity of the material may play an important role in the water uptake; the substitute is considered a non-porous material, but the ionic exchange with the medium provokes its degradation and the formation of micro-porosities that allow water uptake [6,49]. Furthermore, our water uptake values were lower compared to those obtained in other studies on materials made of fibroin and calcium phosphates, which are usually between 42% and 70% [46,47].…”
Section: Characterization Of Sf/nha Substitutes 1) In Vitro Degradcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…4c and 4d) were similar among replicates, as in the degradation test, noting the lack of a direct relationship between the concentration of fibroin and the water uptake. Fibroin is a hydrophobic polymer, while HA is hydrophilic [46,47]. Although there is no point of comparison to determine whether these values are favorable or not, a high percentage water uptake is not beneficial in injectable bone substitutes, since it directly influences their degradation by collapsing the material, mainly when it is hydrophilic, as is the case of HA; in this case, the addition of small percentages of fibroin allows a moderate water uptake due to its hydrophobic nature [46,48].…”
Section: Characterization Of Sf/nha Substitutes 1) In Vitro Degradmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform biomimetic fiber coatings of CaP can be obtained by mineralization of fibrous scaffold in simulated body fluid (SBF) . Similarly, CaP and CaCO 3 can be precipitated on scaffold by its incubation in salt solutions . In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of the deposited apatite layer throughout the scaffold was determined by Eq. at different soaking times . Formed apatitetrue(normalmnormalgtrue)=W1(W21+SR) …”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%