2020
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329202000103
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados. AbstractThis article uses the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method to examine the combinations of conditions that explain the length of World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes that invoke General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs' (GATT) General Exceptions (Article … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already mentioned, the QCA methodology is suitable for investigations with small samples (Cezar, 2020;Li & Ma, 2019;McLevey, 2014) and overcomes the methodological limitations of other statistical and inferential techniques (Woodside, 2013). In addition, it allows one to develop and profile the theory scheme (Redding & Viterna, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already mentioned, the QCA methodology is suitable for investigations with small samples (Cezar, 2020;Li & Ma, 2019;McLevey, 2014) and overcomes the methodological limitations of other statistical and inferential techniques (Woodside, 2013). In addition, it allows one to develop and profile the theory scheme (Redding & Viterna, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology allows researchers to overcome the limitations of conventional statistical techniques (Woodside, 2013). Various investigations that use QCA resort to small samples and provide relevant results (Cezar, 2020;Li & Ma, 2019;McLevey, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%