2016
DOI: 10.1080/09720073.2014.11892073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity, Historicity and Coherence: Preference and Quality of the Changes in the Urban Scene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the Land-wall of Istanbul possesses weak preferability according to scores of photographs and this finding is supported by Alpak et al. 46…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In this case, the Land-wall of Istanbul possesses weak preferability according to scores of photographs and this finding is supported by Alpak et al. 46…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Vale destacar que os componentes visuais presentes no ambiente podem exercer influência sobre como nós percebemos e, consequentemente, avaliamos o ambiente. Do ponto de vista da psicologia ambiental, por exemplo, três componentes são importantes: complexidade, historicidade e coerência (ver Alpak et al 2016). A Complexidade se refere aos vários elementos existentes no ambiente e disponíveis no campo visual do indivíduo.…”
Section: Percepção Da Naturezaunclassified
“…Já a coerência se refere a presença de elementos similares no ambiente, formando uma unidade ordenada; e quanto mais harmoniosa for essa unidade, mais fácil será sua compreensão e percepção. Um estudo empírico observou, por exemplo, que em ambientes urbanos um nível médio de complexidade e um alto nível de coerência e historicidade aumentam a preferência das pessoas por esse tipo de paisagem (Alpak et al 2016).…”
Section: Percepção Da Naturezaunclassified

Bases ecológicas e evolutivas do comportamento humano

Paulino de Albuquerque,
Varella Valentova,
Correa Varella
2024
“…Berlyne [46] suggested that environments with intermediate levels of complexity would be judged as being the most beautiful; that is, humans would prefer medium complexity more than both low and high complexity. In 2016, a study by Alpak et al [47] found that people's preferences indeed were the highest for urban landscapes of intermediate complexity. This study also showed that important predictors of complexity were the experience of coherence and the organization of the components of the urban landscape.…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%