2017
DOI: 10.58221/mosp.v111i2.7732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementos direcionais em afro-variedades de português e espanhol

Abstract: Este artigo traz um panorama descritivo sobre a complementação direcional dos verbos de movimento em afro-variedades de português e espanhol. O estudo se ocupa de amostras da África e da América Latina para mapear contrastes envolvendo o uso de preposições. As afro-variedades serão caracterizadas quanto a estratégias conservadoras e inovadoras de complementação, a partir do estudo de Gonçalves (2010) para o português de Moçambique. Nas amostras analisadas, as afro-variedades de português se mostram mais inovad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that 'source' represents in this study the type of register and its monitoring level, this outcome can be explained by the fact that CB is composed of formal written texts, representing the most monitored subcorpora of our dataset. Since this is -to the best of our knowledge -the first study that investigates the level of monitoring as a conditioning feature related to the investigated phenomenon, this result reinforces the hypothesis presented by Avelar (2017) that formal instruction exerts a strong pressure against the use of the preposition em 'in' with goal-oriented motion verbs, which allows the characterization of the use of a 'at' as artificial, in the sense that it is not learned in a natural way by children in the process of language acquisition. 'Profiling' plays an important role when the source is Blogs_Foruns, C-Oral and TecEM (node 2); i.e., action and neutral profiled tokens are more associated with the use of para 'to' (node 3: N = 116, with N = 64 para 'to'; 41 a 'at'; and 11 em 'in'), while locative profiled tokens are more associated with the use of em 'in' (node 4: N = 192, with N = 126 em 'in'; N = 38 para 'to'; N = 28 a 'at').…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering that 'source' represents in this study the type of register and its monitoring level, this outcome can be explained by the fact that CB is composed of formal written texts, representing the most monitored subcorpora of our dataset. Since this is -to the best of our knowledge -the first study that investigates the level of monitoring as a conditioning feature related to the investigated phenomenon, this result reinforces the hypothesis presented by Avelar (2017) that formal instruction exerts a strong pressure against the use of the preposition em 'in' with goal-oriented motion verbs, which allows the characterization of the use of a 'at' as artificial, in the sense that it is not learned in a natural way by children in the process of language acquisition. 'Profiling' plays an important role when the source is Blogs_Foruns, C-Oral and TecEM (node 2); i.e., action and neutral profiled tokens are more associated with the use of para 'to' (node 3: N = 116, with N = 64 para 'to'; 41 a 'at'; and 11 em 'in'), while locative profiled tokens are more associated with the use of em 'in' (node 4: N = 192, with N = 126 em 'in'; N = 38 para 'to'; N = 28 a 'at').…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There is a tendency for the use of a 'at' in cb, which, in this study, represents the most formal and monitored register. This result is in consonance with the hypothesis that normative tradition exerts a strong pressure against the use of the preposition em 'in' with these verbs (Avelar, 2017). Regarding register, for further studies, it would be interesting to run a regression model with register as a random variable, in order to see the effect sizes of the semantic predictors without register playing a role.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation