2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Resources and the Exploitation of Technological Innovations

Abstract: Technological innovation often results when the resources of a small firm are combined with those of a large one. This is because small and large firms characteristically possess complementary resources whose combination can facilitate innovation success. The possession of complementary innovation-producing resources by small and large firms helps explain patterns of interaction among firms in dynamic, technology-based industries. Propositions are developed that outline how typical resources of small and large… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large, mature firms enter into strategic alliances with small firms and start-ups to benefit from their product innovativeness and adaptability (King et al, 2003). Therefore, large, established corporations and small start-ups enter alliances because of their complementary resources that, among other things, result from the organizations' difference in size.…”
Section: Firm Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large, mature firms enter into strategic alliances with small firms and start-ups to benefit from their product innovativeness and adaptability (King et al, 2003). Therefore, large, established corporations and small start-ups enter alliances because of their complementary resources that, among other things, result from the organizations' difference in size.…”
Section: Firm Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resource-based view (Barney 1991;Wernerfelt 1984) argues that firms' resources affect their competitive advantage and innovation (Galunic and Rodan 1998;King and Hegarty 2003). Prior research has examined the impact of resource constraints (Rao and Drazin 2002) and slack resources (Daniel et al 2004) on innovation and firm performance.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study supports previous allegation made the existence of relationship between green alliances and green marketing quality practices. Firms adopting green alliances shall benefited in many ways: greater access to complementary resources for value creation (King et al, 2003) partners benefits sharing (Lavie, 2009;Destri and Dagnino, 2005), foster innovation by complementary resources (Park et al, 2004) through a value network (Amit and Zott, 2001) increasing benefits through lowering costs (Chwen et al, 2006), risk sharing (Kogut, 1988), allowing specialization advantages (Chen and Paulraj, 2004), learning (Bouncken et al, 2014), and utilizing complementary resources (Park et al, 2004). Green alliances motivate firms to adopt high quality green marketing practices as they face stiff competition from other green companies in the market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms can utilize an alliance or partnership to enhance the green orientation (green alliances). Alliances allow access to complementary resources for value creation (King et al, 2003). The variable is measured using four indicators: willingness to learn collectively, willingness to accept resources sharing, being a member of related associations, willingness for knowledge sharing.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%