2016
DOI: 10.1057/s41262-016-0013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer perceptions of co-branding alliances: Organizational dissimilarity signals and brand fit

Abstract: This study explores how consumers evaluate co-branding alliances between dissimilar partner firms. Customers are well aware that different firms are behind a co-branded product and observe the partner firms' characteristics. Drawing on signaling theory, we assert that consumers use organizational characteristics as signals in their assessment of brand fit and for their purchasing decisions. Some organizational signals are beyond the control of the co-branding partners or at least they cannot alter them on shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(172 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brand extension extends the current brand image to new or modified products in a new category (Aaker and Keller, 1990). Cobranding, also known as "brand alliance," refers to two or more brands used on the same product or service (Decker and Baade, 2016). When two brands are combined in some way, the co-branding is created and the image of one brand can be transferred to another (Decker and Baade, 2016).…”
Section: Brand Image Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brand extension extends the current brand image to new or modified products in a new category (Aaker and Keller, 1990). Cobranding, also known as "brand alliance," refers to two or more brands used on the same product or service (Decker and Baade, 2016). When two brands are combined in some way, the co-branding is created and the image of one brand can be transferred to another (Decker and Baade, 2016).…”
Section: Brand Image Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Group 3, the respondents were exposed to a hypothetical co-brand by Braun and Chanel and asked to indicate their perceptions towards this co-brand. By using a hypothetical co-brand, this paper followed an often-applied practice in the co-branding literature (Ahn and Sung, 2012; Decker and Baade, 2016; Kalafatis et al , 2012). The co-branded product was a facial sonic cleansing brush[1] and the respondents were allowed to look at the corresponding authentic photomontage for as long as they wanted.…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSP characteristics may include overall reputation, location, the technologies employed, facility used, firm size and age, and experience in the industry. Previous research supports that consumers rely on these characteristics to draw inferences about the quality of products or services (Roggeveen, Bharadwaj, and Hoyer 2007) and assess the level of “fit” (Decker and Baade 2016, Lu, Gregory, and Ngo 2020). Our preliminary research results (see Scenario Development section for details) confirm the importance of three key extrinsic cues of OSPs in forming SOF for offshore services: cultural similarity, OSP reputation, and technical capabilities of the OSP as compared with those of focal firms.…”
Section: Conceptual Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%