1997
DOI: 10.1080/00103629709369843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive sorption of copper, nickel, and zinc by an Oxisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
3
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing in various works the soil/solution ratios used, one can see that there is credibility in this ‘solids effect’. The K d values found in our study are similar to those reported by Bibak (1997) who used a soil/solution ratio of 1:500 and reported a K d of 37.9 L kg −1 for Cu and a K d of 14.3 L kg −1 for Zn (Table 3). Conversely, Yuan and Lavkulich (1997) found K d values of 2400 L kg −1 and 1200 L kg −1 for Cu and Zn, respectively, using a much higher soil/solution ratio of 1:40.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observing in various works the soil/solution ratios used, one can see that there is credibility in this ‘solids effect’. The K d values found in our study are similar to those reported by Bibak (1997) who used a soil/solution ratio of 1:500 and reported a K d of 37.9 L kg −1 for Cu and a K d of 14.3 L kg −1 for Zn (Table 3). Conversely, Yuan and Lavkulich (1997) found K d values of 2400 L kg −1 and 1200 L kg −1 for Cu and Zn, respectively, using a much higher soil/solution ratio of 1:40.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…4c) when infiltrated as a pair, decreased their K d compared with their monometal state 2.6 times in the case of Ni and 2.3 times in the case of Zn. Similar rates of decrease of the Cu, Ni, and Zn K d values due to competition are also evident in other works (Harter, 1992; Bibak, 1997; Echeverria et al, 1998), although there is a considerable variation in the initial monometal K d values reported in these studies (Table 3). This shows that, although metal mobility increases when metals are in competition for the common adsorption sites of the soil, the least mobile elements (like Cu) increase their mobility much less than do the more mobile metals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essas equações, embora não esclareçam sobre os mecanismos químicos envolvidos na adsorção, são facilmente aplicáveis para adsorção de quaisquer íons pelo solo e têm a vantagem de fornecer parâmetros que possam ser relacionados com propriedades dos solos. A adsorção de Cu e de Zn varia entre solos e pode ser influenciada por diversas propriedades, tais como: pH, teor de matéria orgânica, composição mineralógica e textura (Shuman, 1975;McBride & Blasiak, 1979;Martínez & Motto, 2000) ou pela competição entre íons pelas superfícies adsorventes (Bibak, 1997;Mesquita, 1998;Echeverría et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Embora numerosos estudos tenham examinado a adsorção de micronutrientes em solos, especialmente de Cu e de Zn (Shuman, 1975;Msaky & Calvet, 1990;Bibak, 1997;Yuan & Lavkulich, 1997;Mesquita, 1998), pouquíssimos têm-se dedicado ao processo reverso: dessorção desses elementos, sendo inexistentes na literatura consultada estudos sobre dessorção de manganês. Como observado por Swift & McLaren (1991), tal situação é paradoxal, uma vez que a dessorção constitui o processo que controla a concentração e a taxa de fornecimento dos micronutrientes para a solução do solo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified