1979
DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
125
0
11

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
125
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Directional sexual selection in natural populations for morphological characters related to body size has been documented in a variety of organisms, including moths (Mason, 1969); beetles (McCauley and Wade, 1978;Mason, 1980;McLain, 1981McLain, , 1982; butterflies (Wickman, 1985); toads (Wilburg et a!., 1978;Davies and Halliday, 1979;Fairchild, 1981;Halliday, 1983); frogs (Howard, 1979(Howard, , 1980Beryen, 1981;Arnold, 1983;Arnold and Wade, 1984b;Howard and Kiuge, 1985;Ryan, 1983;Robertson, 1986); and finches (Price, 1984). In these studies body size was found to be positively correlated with mating success and in the bullfrog, Rana catesbiana, sexual selection accounted for 75 per cent of the total selection differential shifting the mean male size distribution 063 standard deviations (Arnold and Wade, 1984b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directional sexual selection in natural populations for morphological characters related to body size has been documented in a variety of organisms, including moths (Mason, 1969); beetles (McCauley and Wade, 1978;Mason, 1980;McLain, 1981McLain, , 1982; butterflies (Wickman, 1985); toads (Wilburg et a!., 1978;Davies and Halliday, 1979;Fairchild, 1981;Halliday, 1983); frogs (Howard, 1979(Howard, , 1980Beryen, 1981;Arnold, 1983;Arnold and Wade, 1984b;Howard and Kiuge, 1985;Ryan, 1983;Robertson, 1986); and finches (Price, 1984). In these studies body size was found to be positively correlated with mating success and in the bullfrog, Rana catesbiana, sexual selection accounted for 75 per cent of the total selection differential shifting the mean male size distribution 063 standard deviations (Arnold and Wade, 1984b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male anurans use their forelimbs to grasp the female firmly in the armpit or groin, and maintain this position until the female oviposits. Rival suitors often dislodge amplectant males (Davies & Halliday 1979;Byrne & Roberts 2004). Female anurans frequently inflate their bodies when amplexed by males (B. Brunning & B. L. Phillips 2007, personal observation)-as they do when grasped by predators (figure 1a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male toads often call in localized groups, and rival males wrestle for mating access (Bowcock et al 2008) as described for B. bufo ( Davies & Halliday 1978). In bufonids, the amorous attention of multiple males can drown females (Davies & Halliday 1979;Wells 2007), and size mismatches between males and females reduce fertilization success (Davies & Halliday 1977), so both natural and sexual selection may favour female toads able to dislodge unwanted males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large males have advantages in aggressive interactions with other males for females, and in struggles with females to capture or physically control them (Berrill and Arsenault 1984;Atema 1986;Donaldson and Adams 1989). As a result, the mating behavior of males may vary based on their size, the array of competitors they face, and the availability of potential mates (Davies and Halliday 1979;Borgia 1980;Shuster 1989). In theory, variation in the ability of males to interact aggressively for females, male courtship behavior, and sex ratio produces the following: (1) at all sex ratios, large males spend less time guarding each female than small males, and (2) as females become rare, males search less, court more persistently, and guard longer because females that require longer guarding times are more numerous (Parker 1974;Grafen and Ridley 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%