“…Directional sexual selection in natural populations for morphological characters related to body size has been documented in a variety of organisms, including moths (Mason, 1969); beetles (McCauley and Wade, 1978;Mason, 1980;McLain, 1981McLain, , 1982; butterflies (Wickman, 1985); toads (Wilburg et a!., 1978;Davies and Halliday, 1979;Fairchild, 1981;Halliday, 1983); frogs (Howard, 1979(Howard, , 1980Beryen, 1981;Arnold, 1983;Arnold and Wade, 1984b;Howard and Kiuge, 1985;Ryan, 1983;Robertson, 1986); and finches (Price, 1984). In these studies body size was found to be positively correlated with mating success and in the bullfrog, Rana catesbiana, sexual selection accounted for 75 per cent of the total selection differential shifting the mean male size distribution 063 standard deviations (Arnold and Wade, 1984b).…”