1988
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1988.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In D. buzzatii, Santos et al, (1988) and Ruiz & Santos (1989) have found that body size is positively correlated with mating success in a Spanish natural population. These studies have also shown that different karyotypes differ in their mean value for thorax length (Ruiz & Santos, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In D. buzzatii, Santos et al, (1988) and Ruiz & Santos (1989) have found that body size is positively correlated with mating success in a Spanish natural population. These studies have also shown that different karyotypes differ in their mean value for thorax length (Ruiz & Santos, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that thorax length, as a measure of body size is correlated with adult fitness components, e.g. fecundity (Robertson 1957a, b), mating success (Butlin eta!., 1982;Taylor eta!., 1987;Partridge et aL, 1987;Santos et a!., 1988;Taylor & Kekié, 1988), and longevity (Partridge eta!., 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In D. montana, small males showed a reproductive advantage in nature (Aspi & Hoikkala 1992). Finally, there is evidence of stabilizing sexual selection on male size for D. simulans (Markow & Ricker 1992), D. pseudoobscura (Markow and Ricker 1992), D. melanogaster (Markow & Sawka 1991), D. mojavensis (Markow & Ricker 1992), D. buzzatii (Santos et al 1988;Ruiz et al 1991) and D. silvestris (Boake 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more species are studied, the number of examples where the two are uncorrelated is increasing (Table I). Larger male size has been reported to be associated with mating success in D. melanogaster (Partridge et al 1987;Markow 1987Markow , 1988Pitnick 1991), D. nigrospiracula (Markow 1988), D. hydei (Markow 1985;Pitnick & Markow 1994), D. buzzatii (Santos et al 1988), D. testacea (James & Jaenike 1992), D. simulans and D. mojavensis (Markow & Ricker 1992). In contrast with these reports, mating male D. pseudoobscura from a two-year field study were no larger than single males (Markow & Ricker 1992), but larger size was associated with male success in certain samples of another field study (Partridge et al 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional method consists of collecting individuals at different stages (young or adult) or status (breeding or nonbreeding; mating or nonniating) and comparing their frequency distributions for a number of characters. Recent examples using this method to detect premating sexual selection may be found in the fruit fly Drosophila buzzatii (Santos et al, 1988), the water strider Gerris odontogaster (Arnqvist, 1992) and the marine snail Littorina saxatilis (Johannesson et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%