2006 IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop 2006
DOI: 10.1109/redw.2006.295461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compendium of Total Ionizing Dose Results and Displacement Damage Results for Candidate Spacecraft Electronics for NASA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed test results for two device types, LM139 and LM124, that were particularly sensitive to dose rate effects are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2. As expected from previous reports [1][2][3][4][5][6], many devices exhibited some degree of sensitivity to dose rate effects. In most of cases, however, this sensitivity was not significant enough to have major practical impact for many typical spacecraft applications.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The detailed test results for two device types, LM139 and LM124, that were particularly sensitive to dose rate effects are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2. As expected from previous reports [1][2][3][4][5][6], many devices exhibited some degree of sensitivity to dose rate effects. In most of cases, however, this sensitivity was not significant enough to have major practical impact for many typical spacecraft applications.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…HE classic bipolar comparators LM111 and LM119 have been widely used in space applications and have been the subjects of many radiation studies [1]- [10]. One concern for the space community is how the products perform under ionizing radiation at relatively low dose rates [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LM111 has been used extensively as a test vehicle for low dose rate studies. It has been shown that the radiation performance of the LM111 can depend upon manufacturer [1] [2], wafer processing [3], operating conditions [4], operating temperature during irradiation [5], thermal cycling prior to irradiation [6] and dose rate [1]- [3], [5], [7]- [10]. The LM119 did not show a thermal cycling dependence [6] but some versions may have dose rate dependence [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10]- [13] It should be noted that the intent of this study is to provide a general early assessment of dose for the purpose of characterization of radiation tolerance of novel optoelectronic materials and device architectures. Prior to use of a component in a mission, the specific mission dose (accounting for particular anticipated shielding) would be carefully assessed to calculate the fluence required to achieve the specific orbit duration called for [7], [8], [14], [15]. It is general knowledge that monoenergetic, normally-incident proton ground-testing cannot match both the displacement damage and total ionizing dose in orbit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%