2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of nanoindentation, 3-point bending, and tension tests for orthodontic wires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
42
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
42
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a strong correlation (0.84<r 2 <0.92) between the microhardness of enamel and the mineral content, as determined by transverse microradiography of carious lesions 19,21) . Although conventional microhardness testing generally results in large indentations (i.e., an indentation length equivalent to a width of 5-20 enamel prisms) and is influenced by the substrate 19) , recent advances in nanoindentation techniques have enabled measurement of the mechanical properties of extremely small volumes of material, and both the hardness and elastic modulus can be determined simultaneously based on load-displacement data at the submicron scale [28][29][30] . Changes in the elastic modulus of enamel may be associated with the brittleness of the structure; thus, investigating the elastic modulus of enamel provides valuable data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a strong correlation (0.84<r 2 <0.92) between the microhardness of enamel and the mineral content, as determined by transverse microradiography of carious lesions 19,21) . Although conventional microhardness testing generally results in large indentations (i.e., an indentation length equivalent to a width of 5-20 enamel prisms) and is influenced by the substrate 19) , recent advances in nanoindentation techniques have enabled measurement of the mechanical properties of extremely small volumes of material, and both the hardness and elastic modulus can be determined simultaneously based on load-displacement data at the submicron scale [28][29][30] . Changes in the elastic modulus of enamel may be associated with the brittleness of the structure; thus, investigating the elastic modulus of enamel provides valuable data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional Knoop microhardness test generally produces a large indentation (indentation length equivalent to a width of 5-20 enamel prisms) and is also influenced by the substrate 23) . However, recent advances in nanoindentation tests now allow the measurement of mechanical properties of extremely small volumes of material, and the hardness and elastic modulus can be determined simultaneously [25][26][27][28][29] . In the present study, a depth-dependent analysis of the enamel surface region was performed with an isotropic voxel size of 3.6 µm in µCT scanning images and with a 5-µm interval for indentations in nanoindentation testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1000 nm depth analysis (n = 10). Linear extrapolation methods (ISO Standard 14577) were used for the unloading curve between 95% and 70% of the maximum test force to calculate the elastic modulus [30][31][32][33]. The hardness and elastic modulus of the buccal enamel surfaces were calculated using the software bundled with the nano-indentation apparatus.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of the Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%