2010
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Markers typing and IS1245 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism fingerprinting of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis from human and porcine origins

Abstract: BackgroundAnimal mycobacterioses are regarded as a potential zoonotic risk and cause economical losses world wide. M. avium subsp. hominissuis is a slow-growing subspecies found in mycobacterial infected humans and pigs and therefore rapid and discriminatory typing methods are needed for epidemiological studies. The genetic similarity of M. avium subsp. hominissuis from human and porcine origins using two different typing methods have not been studied earlier. The objective of this study was to compare the IS1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The discriminatory power experienced in the present study is slightly reduced compared to what has been described by others [27, 32, 34]. This could be explained by the epidemiologic link between the isolates, as multiple isolates were retrieved from the same farms and production sites and also from the same pigs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discriminatory power experienced in the present study is slightly reduced compared to what has been described by others [27, 32, 34]. This could be explained by the epidemiologic link between the isolates, as multiple isolates were retrieved from the same farms and production sites and also from the same pigs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Of these, three have showed a low allelic diversity for isolates of M. avium subsp. hominissuis in other studies, while TR3 has been demonstrated as monomorphic also in other studies [17, 26, 32, 35]. The employment of these markers in this MLVA analysis is, therefore, not adding as much information as the more diverse loci, and the tandem repeats could be excluded or replaced with other targets, such as one or more of the tandem repeats used in the MATR-VNTR described by Inagaki et al [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Loci 47, 292, 10, and 7 were monomorphic, whereas locus X3 was the most polymorphic, as previously suggested [20][21][22]35]. The discriminatory power of the combined MIRU-VNTR was 0·68, lower than those obtained by other researchers 0·80 [22], 0·88 [20], 0·90 [35], and 0·92 [21]. This finding may be explained by the presence of clones in the concentrated production region of Argentina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Nowadays, MIRU-VNTR analysis is increasingly used for typing M. avium isolates [18][19][20][21][22]. A panel of eight MIRU-VNTR markers has been identified as a suitable tool to discriminate isolates and to study the genetic variability of the strains within the MAC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of reports have described the genotyping of MAC using various methods, including insertion sequence (IS) 1245 and IS1311 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-, pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)-, and variable-number tandemrepeat (VNTR)-based typing [2,3]. It has recently been demonstrated that VNTR typing is useful to distinguish and classify MAC isolates from clinical specimens and environmental sources [4,5]. Moreover, for VNTR typing of MAC, M. avium tandem repeat (MATR)-VNTR and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRU)-VNTR typing methods using variation in the combination of targeted tandem repeat loci have been reported [4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%