2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.jepm.2010.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Methods of Long Bone Fracture Repair in Rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While in this retrospective study there was no randomisation of treatment choice, and only small numbers of fractures were evaluated, our findings, and that of previous reports, indicate that plating of appendicular skeleton fractures in rabbits can be successful when selected in appropriate cases (Terjesen , Barron et al . , Zehnder & Kapatkin ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While in this retrospective study there was no randomisation of treatment choice, and only small numbers of fractures were evaluated, our findings, and that of previous reports, indicate that plating of appendicular skeleton fractures in rabbits can be successful when selected in appropriate cases (Terjesen , Barron et al . , Zehnder & Kapatkin ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, when tested in a femoral ex vivo gap model, the complications seen with combined ESF and IMP fixation, such as fracture of the bone during pin placement or during loading, differ to those observed with bone plate fixation, which typically fail by plate bending (Barron et al . ). Rabbit bone healing was faster after plate fixation compared to ESF in an experimental model, but a reduction in bone strength secondary to plate‐induced stress‐protection was observed between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively (Terjesen ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations