2020
DOI: 10.21163/gt_2020.151.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Budyko-Based Methods for Actual Evapotranspiration in Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract: Evapotranspiration is an important indicator in hydrology, agriculture, and climate. The classical methods to compute the evapotranspiration incorporate climate data of temperature and precipitation. Thornthwaite and Budyko approaches, therefore called here TBA, are the most applied methods for monthly potential evapotranspiration (ET0) respective actual evapotranspiration (AET0). In this study, we have compared the differences between ET0 and AET0 carried out with TBA methods with the crop evapotranspiration … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the frame of the analysis provides 30-year averages, which is convenient for the evaluation of climate and water resources over several decades and to develop future perspectives and plans. Another limitation is related to the monthly ET0 calculated using the Thornthwaite method, which is based on the temperature and precipitations parameters [49,50]. In this approach, the wind speed, solar radiation, and humidity were not considered due to a lack of data and also due to the uncertainties that may appear if these data are projected for the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the frame of the analysis provides 30-year averages, which is convenient for the evaluation of climate and water resources over several decades and to develop future perspectives and plans. Another limitation is related to the monthly ET0 calculated using the Thornthwaite method, which is based on the temperature and precipitations parameters [49,50]. In this approach, the wind speed, solar radiation, and humidity were not considered due to a lack of data and also due to the uncertainties that may appear if these data are projected for the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%