Comparison of Statistical and Dynamic Downscaling Techniques in Generating High-Resolution Temperatures in China from CMIP5 GCMs

Abstract

In aiming for better access to climate change information and for providing climate service, it is important to obtain reliable high-resolution temperature simulations. Systematic comparisons are still deficient between statistical and dynamic downscaling techniques because of their inherent unavoidable uncertainties. In this paper, 20 global climate models (GCMs) and one regional climate model [Providing Regional Climates to Impact Studies (PRECIS)] are employed to evaluate their capabilities in reproducing average trends of mean temperature (Tm), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), and extreme events represented by frost days (FD) and heat-wave days (HD) across China. It is shown generally that bias of temperatures from GCMs relative to observations is over ±1°C across more than one-half of mainland China. PRECIS demonstrates better representation of temperatures (except for HD) relative to GCMs. There is relatively better performance in Huanghuai, Jianghuai, Jianghan, south Yangzi River, and South China, whereas estimation is not as good in Xinjiang, the eastern part of northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau. Bias-correction spatial disaggregation is used to downscale GCMs outputs, and bias correction is applied for PRECIS outputs, which demonstrate better improvement to a bias within ±0.2°C for Tm, Tmax, Tmin, and DTR and ±2 days for FD and HD. Furthermore, such improvement is also verified by the evidence of increased spatial correlation coefficient and symmetrical uncertainty, decreased root-mean-square error, and lower standard deviation for reproductions. It is seen from comprehensive ranking metrics that different downscaled models show the most improvement across different climatic regions, implying that optional ensembles of models should be adopted to provide sufficient high-quality climate information.

Evaluating the Combined Effect of Climate Change and Urban Microclimate on Buildings’ Heating and Cooling Energy Demand in a Mediterranean City

“…They can thus generate climate information at a much finer resolution than GCMs, down to 2.5-100 km, embracing in a more detailed way the topographical particularities and the climatic dynamical processes of the region of interest. On the other hand, an important disadvantage of the method relies on the considerable amount of computational power required, along with the large storage devices for the creation of the datasets [41].…”

Analysis On The Regional Features of Future Warming Using High-Resolution Downscaled Multi-Model Climate Scenarios In China

“…The performances that are presented in the simulations used with statistical downscaled GCMs and bias corrected PRECIS are different in re ecting regional temperature projections. The top ve well-performing models (Table S2) are selected for each zone as described previously (Zhang et al 2020), by the metric of a comprehensive ranking index coupled of the spatial correlation coe cient, the root-mean-square error, standard deviations and symmetrical uncertainty.…”

Deep Learning for Daily Precipitation and Temperature Downscaling

“…Downscaling is generally difficult and cumbersome due to the complex characteristics of spatial‐temporal structure especially for precipitation (e.g., highly skewed and non‐Gaussian distribution). Various downscaling techniques have been developed to tackle this, including dynamical and statistical downscaling (Zhang et al., 2020). Dynamical downscaling relies on a regional climate or numerical weather model to provide high resolution climate factors by simulating the physical processes of the coupled land‐atmosphere system (Rummukainen, 2010).…”