2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl011498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of spectral direct and diffuse solar irradiance measurements and calculations for cloud‐free conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiative closure calculations, in which radiative transfer model calculations are compared to irradiance (flux) or radiance measurements, can serve as a testbed to evaluate the specification of atmospheric column properties retrieved from measurements (including surface conditions, water vapor amount, and aerosol and cloud properties), radiative transfer model calculations, and the radiative measurements themselves (e.g., Michalsky et al, 2006;McFarlane and Evans, 2004;Turner et al, 2004;Halthore and Schwartz, 2000;Mlawer et al, 2000). Previously, studies using data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program have performed such comparisons in the longwave spectral region to refine treatment of the longwave water vapor continuum and to improve the specification of the atmospheric water vapor column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiative closure calculations, in which radiative transfer model calculations are compared to irradiance (flux) or radiance measurements, can serve as a testbed to evaluate the specification of atmospheric column properties retrieved from measurements (including surface conditions, water vapor amount, and aerosol and cloud properties), radiative transfer model calculations, and the radiative measurements themselves (e.g., Michalsky et al, 2006;McFarlane and Evans, 2004;Turner et al, 2004;Halthore and Schwartz, 2000;Mlawer et al, 2000). Previously, studies using data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program have performed such comparisons in the longwave spectral region to refine treatment of the longwave water vapor continuum and to improve the specification of the atmospheric water vapor column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kopp and Lean, 2011), but there is a lack of systematic research on the intercomparison of those solar spectra mentioned above and the impact on climate model simulations due to the differences in these spectra. Mlawer et al (2000) compared the solar spectral irradiance at the surface determined with their line-by-line model (LBLRTM) using the Neckel-Labs and Kurucz95 spectra with high spectral resolution observations obtained at the Southern Great Plains site of the US Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program (Stokes and Schwartz, 1994). Their results suggested that Kurucz95 provides a better modelled irradiance at the surface.…”
Section: Impact Of Solar Spectral Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data measured by the second-generation instrument with higher-performance 1024 × 256 charge-coupled device (CCD) arrays are used in this work. The data from the first-generation instrument have been used by Mlawer et al (2000) to validate LBLRTM. The data obtained at 1100 local time (solar zenith angle 43.59 • ) on 4 March 2000 were used.…”
Section: Comparison Of Spectral Direct Irradiance Determined By Genlnmentioning
confidence: 99%