1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb07014.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sodium hyaluronate and methylcellulose in extracapsular cataract extraction

Abstract: Extracapsular cataract surgery with posterior chamber lens implantation was performed in a total of 30 patients. These were randomly divided into two groups. In one group sodium hyaluronate 1% (Healon) was used as a tool in surgery, in the other group methylcellulose 2% was used. The viscous substances were irrigated out of the eyes at the conclusion of surgery. Central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and aqueous flare were recorded until one month post-operatively. There was no difference in corneal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1991
1991
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning postoperative IOP we could not prove a difference between the two groups, which has been demonstrated by others in favour of M (Thomsen et al 1987); also Liesegang et al (1986) found higher IOP following SH, though not significant. A reason for the lack of difference might at least partly be the removal of the viscoelastic agent from the eye at the end of the operation, as recommended by Fechner among others (Fechner 1983).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning postoperative IOP we could not prove a difference between the two groups, which has been demonstrated by others in favour of M (Thomsen et al 1987); also Liesegang et al (1986) found higher IOP following SH, though not significant. A reason for the lack of difference might at least partly be the removal of the viscoelastic agent from the eye at the end of the operation, as recommended by Fechner among others (Fechner 1983).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The findings in this article concerning postoperative flare are in accordance with the results of the few existing studies on this subject. Thomsen et al (1987) found no difference in aqueous flare postoperatively comparing the use of SH and M peroperatively in extracapsular cataract extraction (30 patients totally). Liesegang et al (1986) also compared the effect of SH and M, in a total of 70 patients, and concluded that both substances helped maintain the anterior chamber and facilitated the operation, although SH was preferred; they found no difference in intraocular inflammation postoperatively between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Other short-term studies of ECCE using either Healon or HPMC have not demonstrated any difference in post-operative intraocular pressure (Liesgang et al 1986;Thomsen et al 1987;Lane et al 1991). Additionally, no difference was found in post-operative central corneal thickness or aqueous flare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The use of viscoelastic agents like Healon and HPMC have been shown to cause an additional IOP elevation in the immediate post-operative phase (Barron et al 1985;Nzser et al 1986;Liesegang et al 1986;Thomsen et al 1987;Ruusuvaara et al 1990). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An early increase in IOP after cataract extraction should be expected no matter what type of surgery is used (Rich et al 1974;Gross et al 1988). The use of viscoelastic agents like Healon and HPMC have been shown to cause an additional IOP elevation in the immediate post-operative phase (Barron et al 1985;Nzser et al 1986;Liesegang et al 1986;Thomsen et al 1987;Ruusuvaara et al 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%