2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-2194-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Sharp Interface to Variable Density Models in Pumping Optimisation of Coastal Aquifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In island aquifers, SI models are commonly used to assess the extent of freshwater lenses and establish water budgets (Izuka et al., 2021; Lotti et al., 2021; Shuler & Mariner, 2020), while their fast simulation times also facilitate parameter estimation and quantification of predictive uncertainty (Coulon et al., 2021). Because of their rapid simulation times, SI models are widely used to optimize pumping rates in continental coastal aquifers, which are faced with the threat of lateral seawater intrusion (Kopsiaftis et al., 2019). However, they have not yet been used for pumping optimization in island freshwater lenses where vertical seawater intrusion (i.e., upconing) is a major risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In island aquifers, SI models are commonly used to assess the extent of freshwater lenses and establish water budgets (Izuka et al., 2021; Lotti et al., 2021; Shuler & Mariner, 2020), while their fast simulation times also facilitate parameter estimation and quantification of predictive uncertainty (Coulon et al., 2021). Because of their rapid simulation times, SI models are widely used to optimize pumping rates in continental coastal aquifers, which are faced with the threat of lateral seawater intrusion (Kopsiaftis et al., 2019). However, they have not yet been used for pumping optimization in island freshwater lenses where vertical seawater intrusion (i.e., upconing) is a major risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue in the linked S/O approach is that directly employing the numerical model in the optimization process is computationally difficult (Kopsiaftis et al 2019). Surrogate models, which are designed to mimic the input-output relationships of original simulators, can significantly reduce the computational burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that previous SWI studies have shown that this sharp interface model leads to conservative estimations of the optimal pumping rates compared to the VDST models (Pool and Carrera 2011;Christelis and Mantoglou 2013;Christelis and Mantoglou 2016a;Kopsiaftis et al 2019a). Also, Llopis-Albert and Pulido-Velazquez ( 2014) have demonstrated that depending on the hydraulic properties of the coastal aquifer, the sharp interface model may deviate significantly from the SWI predictions provided by the VDST model.…”
Section: Multi-fidelity Optimization Using Co-kriging Metamodelsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Using a one-off correction of the density ratio cannot ensure that the resulting optimal solution would be comparable with that obtained from the VDST model, given that a specific iso-salinity contour is usually set as a threshold in the constraint functions (Christelis and Mantoglou 2016a). On the contrary, it is possible that such a correction would result in non-feasible solutions when the optimal pumping rates will be evaluated using the VDST model (Kopsiaftis et al 2019a). Therefore, instead of using the corrected LF sharp interface However, it should be noted that the sequential adjustment of the density ratio, during the operations of the evolutionary algorithm, does not imply a continuous improvement of the sharp interface model.…”
Section: Sbo In Coastal Aquifer Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation