1970
DOI: 10.21236/ad0703579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMPARISON OF PROPAGATION MEASUREMENTS WITH PREDICTED VALUES IN THE 20 TO 10,000 MHz RANGE

Abstract: The on of the Research Laboratories is t) study the oceans, inland waters, the lower and r atmosphere, the space environment, and the earth, in search of the under-A 1 ~m .;i~ l ed to provide more useful services in Improving man's prospects for survival v =as nflue by the physical environment. Laboratories contributing to these studies are:Erh nces Laoboratories: Gteomagnetism, seismology, geodesy, and related earth sc ences; quake processes, internal structure and accurate figure of the Earth, and / . dltrib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the probability of direct visibility between the source and observation point and using the corresponding formulas (11) and (19) we obtain for I co the following expression [34][35][36]:…”
Section: The Problem Of Single Scattering and Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking into account the probability of direct visibility between the source and observation point and using the corresponding formulas (11) and (19) we obtain for I co the following expression [34][35][36]:…”
Section: The Problem Of Single Scattering and Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually their estimations are fairly involved and aimed at calculating the loss of point-to-point paths. Later, during the seventies, vegetation and foliage losses have been reported [11][12][13] at frequencies up to 10 GHz but for relatively few paths. As follows from literature [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], trees have both absorbing effect (caused by scattering from foliage) and diffraction effect (caused by a lateral wave created by the top of the tree layer), mainly for propagation over the trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten troposcatter links are selected from the "measured and predicted long-term distributions of tropospheric transmission loss" by the Office of Telecommunications Report OT/TRER 16 [12]. The RTBS_ERA5 model is compared with ITU-R P.617-2 and ITU-R P.617-5.…”
Section: A Rtbs_era5 Transmission Loss Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have done extensive research in the estimate and forecast of transmission loss. The database of troposcatter links was developed in the mid-to-late-20th century through many troposcatter link experiments [11], [12]. Three scattering propagation mechanisms were proposed [8]: turbulent incoherent scattering, irregular-layer incoherent reflection, and steadylayer coherent reflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually their estimations are fairly involved and aimed at calculating the loss of point-to-point paths. Later, during the seventies, vegetation and foliage losses have been reported [Longley and Reasoner, 1970;Reudink and Wazowicz, 1973;Swarup and Tewari, 1979] at frequencies up to 3 GHz but for relatively few paths. As follows from literature [Tamir, 1967[Tamir, , 1977Sachs and Wyatt, 1968;Dence and Tamir, 1969;Vogel and Goldhirsch, 1986;Matzler, 1994;Lebherz et al, 1992;Weissberger, 1982, Hagn andBarker, 1970], trees have mostly absorbing and scattering effects for propagation inside the trees layer and lesser diffraction effects, mainly for the case of propagation over the trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%