2003
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.1826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Precipitation Kinetics and Strengthening in an Fe-0.8%Cu Alloy and a 0.8% Cu-containing Low-carbon Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,[30][31][32] Both the peak hardness and the aging time to peak are in between those reported for 0.8 wt % Cu ͑Ref. 30͒ and for 1.3 wt % Cu, 12 and very close to that reported for 1.0 wt % Cu.…”
Section: A Aging Curvessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…12,[30][31][32] Both the peak hardness and the aging time to peak are in between those reported for 0.8 wt % Cu ͑Ref. 30͒ and for 1.3 wt % Cu, 12 and very close to that reported for 1.0 wt % Cu.…”
Section: A Aging Curvessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A number of analytical techniques exist by which fine precipitates in low alloyed steels can be analyzed; these include scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), [3,4,9,10] small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), [10,11] and small angle neutron scattering (SANS). [9,[12][13][14] Traditional SEM is generally limited to large size precipitates (>50 nm), although field emission SEM has the capabilities of examining finer precipitates (<10 nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13-16 and 27͒ and small-angle x-ray scattering ͑SAXS͒ experiments, 28,29 limited information is available on the precipitation behavior before peak aging. Previous SANS and SAXS experiments were all performed ex situ ͑at room temperature͒ and neither concentrate on the effect of deformation on the Cu precipitation nor on the addition of B and N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%