2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of postharvest UV-B and UV-C treatments on table grape: Changes in phenolic compounds and their transcription of biosynthetic genes during storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With positive effect, it is proven that the ultraviolet radiation, when applied in appropriate conditions, is able to increase the antioxidant capacity of fruits and vegetables, being a technology with commercial potential to be used in post-harvest stages in order to extend shelf life and increase quality, such as papaya, grape, and pineapple [67,68]. Supposedly, UV-C radiation is able to increase phenolic content and antioxidant enzymatic activities as a defense mechanism against oxidative stress, thus increasing the antioxidant activity of vegetables [67,69,70].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With positive effect, it is proven that the ultraviolet radiation, when applied in appropriate conditions, is able to increase the antioxidant capacity of fruits and vegetables, being a technology with commercial potential to be used in post-harvest stages in order to extend shelf life and increase quality, such as papaya, grape, and pineapple [67,68]. Supposedly, UV-C radiation is able to increase phenolic content and antioxidant enzymatic activities as a defense mechanism against oxidative stress, thus increasing the antioxidant activity of vegetables [67,69,70].…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to obtain fruit and vegetables enriched with phytochemicals, elicitor treatments might be used either singularly or in combination to trigger desired effects (Schreiner & Huyskens‐Keil, ). In this context, during the last decades, several studies have shown promising results regarding the use of UV radiation as a non‐molecular tool for the modification of the content of bioactive compounds in food (Rodriguez, Torre, & Solhaug, ; Sankari, Hridya, Sneha, Doss, & Ramamoorthy, ; Sheng et al, ). UV‐B radiation (280–315 nm) acts as an abiotic physical elicitor of resistance mechanisms, leading to a rapid increase of stress‐response compounds such as phenols, flavonoids, and phytoalexins (Schreiner & Huyskens‐Keil, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cDNA concentration was determined and adjusted to the same concentration for all tested samples. Relative gene expression levels of TNF‐α , IL‐1β , IL‐10 , and β‐actin were determined in triplicate using a CFX96 real‐time PCR detection system (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), with cDNA as the template and SYBR® green as the fluorescent probe 35 . The primers used for quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) analysis are listed in Table S2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%