2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1309-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies

Abstract: Tissue simulants are typically used in ballistic testing as substitutes for biological tissues. Many simulants have been used, with gelatine amongst the most common. While two concentrations of gelatine (10 and 20 %) have been used extensively, no agreed standard exists for the preparation of either. Comparison of ballistic damage produced in both concentrations is lacking. The damage produced in gelatine is also questioned, with regards to what it would mean for specific areas of living tissue. The aim of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant variance in trajectory or the degree of fragmentation was found between rib and intercostal impacts, suggesting that TGT is similar whether or not the projectile hits the rib. This contrasts the conclusions of Mabbott et al ,15 who compared plain gelatin blocks with porcine thoraxes, observed greater bullet fragmentation in the thorax groups and suggested that bone impact may increase bullet fragmentation 15. Differences in target composition and ammunition could account for the difference in observations here—thoracic samples in Mabbott et al ’s study comprised two porcine thoracic walls with skin and subcutaneous soft tissue and a lung in-between15 whereas our model only used one layer of ribs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No significant variance in trajectory or the degree of fragmentation was found between rib and intercostal impacts, suggesting that TGT is similar whether or not the projectile hits the rib. This contrasts the conclusions of Mabbott et al ,15 who compared plain gelatin blocks with porcine thoraxes, observed greater bullet fragmentation in the thorax groups and suggested that bone impact may increase bullet fragmentation 15. Differences in target composition and ammunition could account for the difference in observations here—thoracic samples in Mabbott et al ’s study comprised two porcine thoracic walls with skin and subcutaneous soft tissue and a lung in-between15 whereas our model only used one layer of ribs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…This contrasts the conclusions of Mabbott et al ,15 who compared plain gelatin blocks with porcine thoraxes, observed greater bullet fragmentation in the thorax groups and suggested that bone impact may increase bullet fragmentation 15. Differences in target composition and ammunition could account for the difference in observations here—thoracic samples in Mabbott et al ’s study comprised two porcine thoracic walls with skin and subcutaneous soft tissue and a lung in-between15 whereas our model only used one layer of ribs. Although Mabbott et al ’s model provides a more realistic representation of the thorax, their study did not focus on the effect of anatomical impact site 15.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With synthetic models such as gelatine, the relative transparency allows for visual analysis of gunshot wounding (GSW) using techniques such as high speed video (HSV) to capture the effect of the projectile on the target in real time [6,10,12,14]. With respect to the study of GSW in cadaveric or live tissue, one of the difficulties in the analysis of wounding patterns is the opacity of the surrogate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research in ballistics has focused on soft tissue injuries including autopsy features and experimental aspects utilising animal models, ballistics simulants and dummy models (Bir et al 2016;Humphrey et al 2017;Humphrey and Kumaratilake 2016;Jönsson et al 1988;Mabbott et al 2016;Schantz 1978). When it comes to bony injuries from projectiles, a lot of research has been conducted into maxillofacial ballistics trauma (Berryman et al 1995;Lahren et al 1987;Stefanopoulos et al 2015;Viel et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%