2012
DOI: 10.1179/2045772311y.0000000046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods to assess energy expenditure and physical activity in people with spinal cord injury

Abstract: Objective: To compare different methods of assessing energy expenditure (EE) and physical activity (PA) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) under community-dwelling conditions. Methods: A reference standard encompassing the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique, heart rate monitoring (FLEX-HR), a multi-sensor armband (SenseWear Armband (SWA)), and two PA recall questionnaires were employed in 14 people with SCI to estimate EE and leisure-time PA. Results: Mean total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) assessed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On a related note, with a larger sample of ambulators, some of the nonsignificant pathways may have been significant. We also acknowledge the limitations of using a self-report measure of LTPA; however, we retain confidence in our findings given that the PARA-SCI is superior to the other widely available measures of energy expenditure in persons with SCI (other questionnaire, heart rate monitoring, arm-band accelerometer) when referenced against the gold-standard of doubly labeled water [20]. Finally, the interview participants were all middle-aged or older and had some experience, past or present, with LTPA.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a related note, with a larger sample of ambulators, some of the nonsignificant pathways may have been significant. We also acknowledge the limitations of using a self-report measure of LTPA; however, we retain confidence in our findings given that the PARA-SCI is superior to the other widely available measures of energy expenditure in persons with SCI (other questionnaire, heart rate monitoring, arm-band accelerometer) when referenced against the gold-standard of doubly labeled water [20]. Finally, the interview participants were all middle-aged or older and had some experience, past or present, with LTPA.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The PARA-SCI has demonstrated good construct validity and reliability as a measure of physical activity among people with SCI [20,21,19]. As per the PARA-SCI protocol, during a structured interview, participants recalled all physical activities they performed over the previous 3 days that required physical exertion.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research using the PARA-SCI suggests that these are activities with a metabolic equivalent (MET) value of 1.5 or greater. 21 Participants were also asked to report the times they woke up and went to sleep each day. Average daily awake time was created by taking a sum of daily awake time and dividing by three.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PARA-SCI has demonstrated reliability and validity for use in people with SCI, establishing validity through comparison with both doubly labelled water and indirect calorimetry. 19,21,22 Demographic characteristics. Participants reported their age, sex, education, ethnicity and marital status at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Todavia, os indivíduos acometidos frequentemente adotam estilo de vida sedentário, com reduções significativas no nível de atividade física cotidiana, que repercute negativamente em vários aspectos da saúde, qualidade e expectativa de vida 2 . A limitação motora decorrente da lesão na medula espinhal promove redução na massa magra e diminuições na taxa metabóli-ca basal que podem chegar perto de 30% 3 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified