Comparison of Methods for Postural Assessment in the Operation of Agricultural Machinery

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the methods of ergonomics assessment RULA, REBA, OWAS and TOR-TOM, which the intent is to highlight similarities and differences in their use, during tillage operation with farm machinery. The study was conducted through an exploratory research in Boa Vista do Incra, RS, in August 2017, during soil preparation operation, with a tractor-subsoiler set. The operation was filmed over a period of 10 hours. After that, it was selected one hour of video, which was assumed to be representative, the video was analyzed by the methods RULA, REBA, OWAS and TOR-TOM through the software Ergolândia 5.0 and TOR-TOM, with the aid of information on noise, temperature and strength. For the comparative analyses, it was analyzed the ease of application, the importance of posture and complementary variables, and the scope of activity and postural factors. The OWAS method showed highlight in the ease of application, while the REBA and RULA methods stood out for the importance of the postural variables. For the importance of the complementary variables, RULA, followed by REBA, are worth mentioning as the most suitable. Similar results were obtained for the scope of posture factors, especially for these two methods. Regarding the scope of activity factors, the TOR-TOM obtained the most satisfactory results. Thus, the comparative analysis has highlighted the RULA method as the most suitable for postural analysis in agricultural machinery, besides the REBA method, for presenting very similar situations, contemplating full body analysis.

Spatio-Temporal Pyramid Graph Convolutions for Human Action Recognition and Postural Assessment

“…MSD is a major contributing factor to disability, loss of independence, and early retirement. Therefore, many studies analyze the ergonomic risk to workers, particularly in manufacturing assembly [36,48,6,42,38,30].…”

A Multi-Task Learning Approach for Human Activity Segmentation and Ergonomics Risk Assessment

“…The United States alone has more than 150,000 workers suffering from back injuries annually due to repetitive lifting of heavy objects using inappropriate postures. Hence, many studies have recently looked at designing automated ERA methods [37,46,6,41,39,22,33,32]. The most widely used methods in the industry are Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) [12] and European Assembly Worksheet (EAWS) [42].…”