2014
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for estimation of the covariance matrix of measurement errors

Abstract: Measurement errors normally present in measured process variables can mask the actual process conditions and lead to wrong operational decisions. This is due not only to the imprecise measured values but also to the propagation of the measurement error through process models used to perform control and optimization tasks. One possible alternative to deal with this problem is to characterize the measurement errors online and to incorporate the obtained information in the process operation. The present work anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it could suggest that estimating the error relative to the different samples could be of interest if the result has to be used in further calculations to modify the algorithm [42] or determine uncertainty of models [17,43]. The results set the scene for further works that could include the investigation and evaluation of other methods for the estimation of covariance matrices of the measurement errors [44] and the comparison with covariance matrices constructed [45] by incorporating known sources of errors. Another interesting aspect could deal with the propagation of error when applying signal filters (as studied for the Kalman Filter [46]) or spectra preprocessing [47].…”
Section: Study Of the Influences Of Time Of Background And Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it could suggest that estimating the error relative to the different samples could be of interest if the result has to be used in further calculations to modify the algorithm [42] or determine uncertainty of models [17,43]. The results set the scene for further works that could include the investigation and evaluation of other methods for the estimation of covariance matrices of the measurement errors [44] and the comparison with covariance matrices constructed [45] by incorporating known sources of errors. Another interesting aspect could deal with the propagation of error when applying signal filters (as studied for the Kalman Filter [46]) or spectra preprocessing [47].…”
Section: Study Of the Influences Of Time Of Background And Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stages of the implemented procedure involved pre-treatment and characterization of the data. As a matter of fact, proper understanding of some characteristics of the data are fundamental for adequate implementation of the data reconciliation stage [24]. The initial characterization of the data was performed offline and using historical data available in the data acquisition system of the industrial site.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the uncertainties of measurements to be evaluated somehow, which is not always easy. Regarding on-line operational measured data, which may contain gross errors, the standard deviation of measurement data may not be suitable for uncertainty evaluation and some techniques have been proposed for on-line characterization of process data for real-time applications [157,158]. An alternative to evaluate the standard deviations of measurement errors based on measuring instrument nominal accuracy is [159]:…”
Section: A Short Note On the Performance Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%