Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2012.oth1b.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Intra-Channel Nonlinearity Tolerance between Reduced-Guard-Interval CO-OFDM Systems and Nyquist Single Carrier Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, with the ECL/ECL configuration, the system with N I F FT = 256 performs slightly worse than the other two systems. This is caused by the reduced tolerance to fiber nonlinearities since for symbols with a larger N I F FT the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) increases and the de-correlation between subcarriers resulting from the CD-induced walk-off is reduced [10]. In the ECL/DFB configuration with CPE compensation, the system with N I F FT = 64 has the worst performance due to the largest DEPN.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, with the ECL/ECL configuration, the system with N I F FT = 256 performs slightly worse than the other two systems. This is caused by the reduced tolerance to fiber nonlinearities since for symbols with a larger N I F FT the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) increases and the de-correlation between subcarriers resulting from the CD-induced walk-off is reduced [10]. In the ECL/DFB configuration with CPE compensation, the system with N I F FT = 64 has the worst performance due to the largest DEPN.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, for the RGI CO-OFDM system, the symbol size is not restricted by the accumulated CD and can be designed based on other requirements. Former studies found that OFDM systems with a smaller symbol size are more robust to laser phase noise and fiber nonlinearity, but these systems have more side lobe power leakage and thus are more sensitive to narrow filtering effects (when the FFT size < 100) [5,6]. Therefore, a symbol size of 128 samples would be a suitable choice for optical transmission considering the overall conditions.…”
Section: Scalability On Different Fft Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel scheme enables the use of a small OFDM symbol size while maintaining a reduced CP overhead (≤5%). Moreover, a small OFDM symbol size (e.g., FFT size N DFT ) provides some additional benefits: (1) a reduced computational effort, (2) a reduced training symbol (TS) overhead, (3) a faster channel tracking speed, (4) a higher tolerance to laser phase noise, and (5) an potentially improved fiber nonlinearity tolerance [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Therefore, RGI-CO-OFDM is a promising variation of CO-OFDM systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, for OFDM systems, discrete Fourier transform spread (DFT-S) OFDM has been proposed to reduce PAPR, and mitigate the fiber nonlinearity [2]. Both Nyquist-SC and DFT-S OFDM can effectively overcome some of their intrinsic drawbacks, and achieve similar transmission performance, which may be promising techniques for future ultra long-haul transmission [3], [4]. Manuscript Recently, DFT-S OFDM has been combined with orthogonal band multiplexing to achieve a high transmission capacity [2], [5].…”
Section: Investigation Of Coherent Optical Multiband Dft-s Ofdm In Lomentioning
confidence: 99%