2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of general circulation model atmospheric wave simulations with wind observations of venusian mesosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(85 reference statements)
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forbes and Konopliv (2007) suggested that planetary scale waves originating in the cloud layer would propagate to the thermosphere, based on an analysis of data obtained by Magellan. Recent GCM calculations by Hoshino et al (2012) and Nakagawa et al (2013) further suggest that only Kelvin waves propagate up to thermospheric altitudes (up to ∼130 km) with significant amplitudes, and not tides. Rossby waves have small amplitudes at ∼130 km.…”
Section: Gravity Waves: Airglow and Other Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forbes and Konopliv (2007) suggested that planetary scale waves originating in the cloud layer would propagate to the thermosphere, based on an analysis of data obtained by Magellan. Recent GCM calculations by Hoshino et al (2012) and Nakagawa et al (2013) further suggest that only Kelvin waves propagate up to thermospheric altitudes (up to ∼130 km) with significant amplitudes, and not tides. Rossby waves have small amplitudes at ∼130 km.…”
Section: Gravity Waves: Airglow and Other Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The realistic amplitude of gravity waves can be obtained for all altitude regions considering the information of gravity waves near the cloud layer, which has recently been obtained from VEX observations. Nakagawa et al [] reported the initial simulation results with the MK scheme, which were used to estimate the amplitude of the wind variations caused by gravity waves. They suggested that gravity waves caused wind variation with an amplitude of ∼15 m/s at the evening terminator in the 110 km altitude region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this altitude range, the numerical simulations showed that atmospheric circulation distinctly changes due to the momentum transport from lower atmosphere by an upward propagating gravity wave (GW) (Hoshino et al 2013;Nakagawa et al 2013). An improved version of a ground-to-thermosphere Venus general circulation model (GCM) including a non-orographic GW parameterization developed at Institut Pierre Simon Laplace/ Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (IPSL/LMD) (Gilli et al 2017) provides a better representation of temperature profiles at altitudes above 100 km, such as those observed by the SPICAV (Spectroscopy for the Investigation of the Characteristics of the Atmosphere of Venus) and SOIR (Solar Ocultation at Infrared) instruments on Venus Express.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Goldstein et al (1991) performed the first measurement at this altitude range with heterodyne spectroscopy and obtained a global circulation including SS-AS flow. The dayside non-LTE CO 2 emission lines have been used for the retrieval of wind velocity and temperature profiles in the lower thermosphere at the altitude of 110 ± 10 km (e.g., Krause et al 2018;Nakagawa et al 2013;Sonnabend et al 2008Sonnabend et al , 2010Sonnabend et al , 2012Sornig et al 2008Sornig et al , 2012Sornig et al , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%