2008 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2008.4625763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four similarity measures based on GO annotations for Gene Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In PPI prediction and validation, similarly, semantic similarity can be the sole approach ( 5 , 19 ) or be used to improve already existing techniques ( 20 ). Finally, the role of semantic similarity in the analysis of transcriptomics and proteomics data is mainly the improvement of clustering of co-expressed gene products ( 21–23 ).…”
Section: Biomedical Kgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PPI prediction and validation, similarly, semantic similarity can be the sole approach ( 5 , 19 ) or be used to improve already existing techniques ( 20 ). Finally, the role of semantic similarity in the analysis of transcriptomics and proteomics data is mainly the improvement of clustering of co-expressed gene products ( 21–23 ).…”
Section: Biomedical Kgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The edge-based approach relies on the structure of the GO graph (Wu et al (2006), Chen et al (2007), Al-Mubaid & Nagar (2008)). Basically, the semantic similarity between two GO terms is defined as the distance between two connected terms, which is the length of a path connecting the two terms in the GO graph.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%