2020
DOI: 10.1093/database/baaa078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Collection of Benchmark Data Sets for Knowledge Graph-based Similarity in the Biomedical Domain

Abstract: The ability to compare entities within a knowledge graph is a cornerstone technique for several applications, ranging from the integration of heterogeneous data to machine learning. It is of particular importance in the biomedical domain, where semantic similarity can be applied to the prediction of protein–protein interactions, associations between diseases and genes, cellular localization of proteins, among others. In recent years, several knowledge graph-based semantic similarity measures have been develope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(51 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing our results, we conclude that in the PFAM datasets, lower correlations were generally found for the incomplete annotation datasets, but the opposite happens in the PPI datasets. These results are in agreement with conclusions in [55].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing our results, we conclude that in the PFAM datasets, lower correlations were generally found for the incomplete annotation datasets, but the opposite happens in the PPI datasets. These results are in agreement with conclusions in [55].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Analyzing our results, we conclude that in the PFAM datasets, lower correlations were generally found for the incomplete annotation datasets, but the opposite happens in the PPI datasets. These results are in agreement with conclusions in [57]. We have developed an approach that considers the different KG semantic aspects used to describe entities and relies on ML to learn a supervised semantic similarity.…”
Section: Static Versus Supervised Similaritysupporting
confidence: 90%