2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-86702003000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of four extraction methods to detect hepatitis A virus RNA in serum and stool samples

Abstract: The efficiency of extraction methods for hepatitis A virus (HAV) RNA in clinical samples is of great importance for molecular diagnosis, especially in regions endemic for HAV, such as Brazil. We compared the efficiency of four different extraction techniques in serum and stool samples for the detection of hepatitis A virus by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). We used PCR to analyse serum and stool samples of 12 patients who were referred to the Brazilian Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis (BRCVH) in Rio de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early protocols for RNA extraction from serum or stool included proteinase K digestion followed by phenolchloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation (167,199). Subsequently, products which used guanidinium thiocyanatephenol-chloroform (41) became commercially available for extraction of RNA and total nucleic acids (40) and increased the sensitivity and specificity of HAV detection (65,112,170). Antigen capture RT-PCR (116) and magnetic beads coated with anti-HAV (124) have been used to separate virus from potential inhibitors of reverse transcription and PCRs that are often found in environmental and stool samples.…”
Section: Molecular Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early protocols for RNA extraction from serum or stool included proteinase K digestion followed by phenolchloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation (167,199). Subsequently, products which used guanidinium thiocyanatephenol-chloroform (41) became commercially available for extraction of RNA and total nucleic acids (40) and increased the sensitivity and specificity of HAV detection (65,112,170). Antigen capture RT-PCR (116) and magnetic beads coated with anti-HAV (124) have been used to separate virus from potential inhibitors of reverse transcription and PCRs that are often found in environmental and stool samples.…”
Section: Molecular Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 247‐bp fragment encompassing the VP1‐2A junction of the HAV genome was amplified by nested reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) using primers and conditions described previously [de Paula et al, 2003b]. RT‐PCR was performed with 10 µl extracted RNA using Superscript II H − reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and random hexamer primers according to the manufacturer's instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both methods employing silica presented similar results, the silica/guanidine isothiocyanate method was chosen to avoid additional steps in the DNA extraction procedure. In addition, this method is known to efficiently remove PCR inhibitors from clinical samples and it provides greater stability to the extracted nucleic acid (Romero, 1999;Rassol et al, 2002;Paula et al, 2003). Although mice are susceptible to infection with C. abortus strain S26/3, no infected mice died or presented any clinical sign during this experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%