2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8502(99)00556-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Filtration and Impingement for Sampling Airborne Endotoxin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low number of gram-negative bacteria isolated in the air samples did not imply that the air was free from their endotoxins because the activity of endotoxins is not terminated with the degradation of the bacteria (Zucker et al, 2000b), thus posing a health risk for both animals and farm workers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low number of gram-negative bacteria isolated in the air samples did not imply that the air was free from their endotoxins because the activity of endotoxins is not terminated with the degradation of the bacteria (Zucker et al, 2000b), thus posing a health risk for both animals and farm workers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the air to be tested is led through pyrogen-free water which is then tested in the lAl. the higher pyrogen retrieval by impingement when compared to filtration, possibly due to the incomplete eluation of the sample from the filters, was demonstrated by Zucker et al (2000). A new approach of measuring the integral inflammatory activity in air samples in different environments by WBt was reported by Kindinger et al, 2005.…”
Section: Airborne Pyrogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method may inaccurately represent the quantity of allergens and pyrogens entering the lungs (Platts‐Mills et al., 1995). In recent studies that have targeted airborne endotoxin, the most widely adapted practice is to collect known quantities of air through membrane filters, although standard AGI‐30 liquid impingers (Ace Glass Inc., Vineland, NJ, USA) have been used and appear to be more efficient when compared with other particle samplers (Duchaine et al., 2001; Zucker et al., 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%