2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ELISA and PCR assays for the diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, molecular diagnostics have been considered for validation of macroscopic diagnosis of ambiguous lesions as these tests were reported to be highly specific and sensitive (Gonzalez et al 2006;Sato et al 2006;Chiesa et al 2010). Recently, Ramahefarisoa et al (2010) evaluated the performance of PCR test targeting mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene for ante-mortem diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis. Hence, in the present study PCR test was used to detect the metacestode of T. solium and also to validate the meat inspection results, as it involves simple and inexpensive method of sample processing besides facilitating collateral confirmation with high specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, molecular diagnostics have been considered for validation of macroscopic diagnosis of ambiguous lesions as these tests were reported to be highly specific and sensitive (Gonzalez et al 2006;Sato et al 2006;Chiesa et al 2010). Recently, Ramahefarisoa et al (2010) evaluated the performance of PCR test targeting mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene for ante-mortem diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis. Hence, in the present study PCR test was used to detect the metacestode of T. solium and also to validate the meat inspection results, as it involves simple and inexpensive method of sample processing besides facilitating collateral confirmation with high specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the performance of PCR and Antibody ELISA assays has been evaluated by the IPM on 67 pig serum samples. Results indicate that ELISA on pig serum samples shows high sensitivity and good specificity while the PCR has a high specificity but a low sensitivity [30]. The B158/B60 Ag-ELISA [27,28,31] was tested in Madagascar on swine sera.…”
Section: Human Cysticercosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, PCR and ELISA have been successfully applied for the detection of parasites in meat, [66][67][68][69][70][71] although with the same disadvantages as previously mentioned. For its part, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has been shown to be a powerful tool for isolating proteins from Anisakis.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Contamination By Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%