2017
DOI: 10.15576/asp.fc/2017.16.1.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Direct Outflow Calculated by Modified SCS-Cn Methods for Mountainous and Highland Catchments in Upper Vistula Basin, Poland and Lowland Catchment in South Carolina, Usa

Abstract: The aim of the study is to compare direct outflow from storm events estimated using modifications of original SCS-CN procedure. The study was conducted in a mountainous catchment of Kamienica river and a highland catchment draining Stobnica river located in Upper Vistula water region, both in Poland, and a headwater lowland watershed WS80 located at the Santee Experimental Forest in South Carolina, USA. For estimating the event outflows for the Kamienica and Stobnica River basins, the initial data on observed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rainfall distribution for storm event was based on Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau DVWK method [33]. Direct runoff was calculated based on the Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number SCS-CN method [32,36,37] according to the following formulas:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rainfall distribution for storm event was based on Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau DVWK method [33]. Direct runoff was calculated based on the Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number SCS-CN method [32,36,37] according to the following formulas:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results show improvement in flow predictions using CNs adjusted for antecedent runoff conditions and water table position (Epps et al, 2013b). In a similar study using modification of the soil water retention parameter in the CN model, Wałęga et al (2017) found better predictions of storm runoff events on WS80 compared to the classic SCS-CN method, consistent with Blair et al (2012). Most recently, Walega et al (2019) successfully tested a modified version of the widely used SCS-CN based SME model and SCS TR-55 graphical peak discharge methods for predicting runoff and peak discharge, respectively, for selected storm events from the WS80 watershed for 2011-2015 period.…”
Section: Model Development Testing/applicationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…where CN is the curve number related to the soil characteristics, land cover and the antecedent moisture condition. The SCS methodology can be successfully applied in Polish hydrometeorological conditions as shown by previous research [69]. Basing on methodology applied by Ignar [70], the soils were classified into four groups of different infiltration capabilities : A, the highest; B, above the mean; C, below the mean; and D, the lowest.…”
Section: Pluvial Flood Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%