2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different reactive organophosphorus flame retardant agents for cotton: Part I. The bonding of the flame retardant agents to cotton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was suggested that TMM functioned as a bonding agent by forming a covalent bridge between MDPA and cellulose [25]. In our previous research, however, we found that approximately 50% of MDPA can be bound to cotton directly without a bonding agent and that TMM improve the flame retardancy of MDPA primary by providing synergistic nitrogen and also by modestly increase the bonding of MDPA on cotton at higher MDPA concentrations [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was suggested that TMM functioned as a bonding agent by forming a covalent bridge between MDPA and cellulose [25]. In our previous research, however, we found that approximately 50% of MDPA can be bound to cotton directly without a bonding agent and that TMM improve the flame retardancy of MDPA primary by providing synergistic nitrogen and also by modestly increase the bonding of MDPA on cotton at higher MDPA concentrations [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The structure of MDPA is shown in Scheme 1(A). The commercial MDPA product contained ∼15% phosphorus by weight and each MDPA molecule contains a synergistic nitrogen atom, and both the phosphorus and the synergistic nitrogen contributed to the flame retardancy of MDPA [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results proved that the FR coating is able to react directly with cellulose through its N-methylol group to form a crosslinked polymeric network and the bonding is highly resistant to hydrolysis during multiple home launderings. Consequently, more FR molecules are able to bind to cotton through the CL crosslinking bridges (Wu and Yang 2006;Yang and Yang 2005). Furthermore, the superior performance of PA as catalyst in forming stable crosslinked polymeric networks helps maintain the durability of flame-retardant properties of the treated fabric, i.e.…”
Section: Flammabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flame retardancy properties are evaluated through flammability tests, such as Limiting Oxygen Index (Beninate, Trask, & Drake, 1981;Cheng & Yang, 2009;Cullis, Hirschler, & Madden, 1992;Tian et al, 1999;Wu & Yang, 2006Yang & Wu, 2003a, 2003b, vertical flame tests (based on ASTM D1230) (Liodakis, Fetsis, & Agioviasitis, 2009;Mostashari & Baie, 2008;Mostashari & Baie, 2009;Mostashari & Fayyaz, 2008) or others standards (Wu & Yang, 2008). Such tests have also been performed on cotton blends (Li et al, 2010;; in any case, they can provide only partial information concerning the burning behaviour of a polymeric material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%