2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cylindrical and conical basins with optimum position of runner: Gravitational water vortex power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
33
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the computational study suggests that the conical basin is much better than the cylindrical one for the provided head and discharge. It is highlighted that several researchers also conducted a number of tests on the basin [12,15,24]. They found that the vortex strength in the conical basin was stronger than in the cylindrical basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the computational study suggests that the conical basin is much better than the cylindrical one for the provided head and discharge. It is highlighted that several researchers also conducted a number of tests on the basin [12,15,24]. They found that the vortex strength in the conical basin was stronger than in the cylindrical basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the basin, a gravitational vortex is generated and the kinetic energy of water is extracted by a vertical-axis turbine in the centre of the vortex, with rotates coaxially with it to harness the kinetic energy. The system can be installed in a serial or parallel configuration along the river to increase power production [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A turbine is placed in the centre of the vortex, using the rotational water field to generate torque on the runner. It has been implemented in sites in Austria [40], Indonesia, Nepal [42,43] and…”
Section: Low-head Pico-hydropower Turbine Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is some scepticism in its use [46], with low efficiencies found in some laboratory experiments [42,44,45], whilst some authors claim higher efficiencies, close to 75%, at 1.5 m head and water flow rate of 0.2 m³/s [43]. The low-head Turgo turbine proposed in [39] has been shown to frequency.…”
Section: Low-head Pico-hydropower Turbine Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also discovered that a cylindrical container with an orifice in the middle of the basin with plate might be the best configuration in order to obtain the optimum value of kinetic energy. [4] conducted research on the effect of conical basin compared to conventional cylindrical basin on the production of kinetic energy. The research found that the basin entrance, basin diameter, notch length, canal height and cone angle affect the production of kinetic energy by vortex turbine.…”
Section: Fig 2 Vortex Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%