Recently, the utilization of low-head hydroelectric technologies has received a great attention for the expansion of distributed power systems into isolated regions that are difficult to be connected to the electrical grid, especially in developing countries. The use of gravitational vortex hydropower systems can be a renewable and suitable option to expand electricity access and promote development in these remote regions, which are concomitantly rich in hydric resources, due to this system can operate with low head without the need of a large reservoir and installation area. In this study, the performance of the inlet channel and basin of a gravitational water vortex turbine was investigated. Two inlet channels and two basin geometries were numerically analysed in Ansys Fluent software. The velocity and vortex height were calculated and compared for each setting. It was found that the inlet channel with conical basin tended to produce more symmetric vortex in comparisons with that generated by the cylindrical geometry. Additionally, the conical basin maximized the flow velocity on the water surface area.
A gravitational water vortex hydraulic turbine (GWVHT) is a low head hydropower technology with a vertical runner for extracting energy from the water vortex. To determine the optimal position (h) of the runner for the hydropower plant efficiency to be increased, a runner in three different positions was compared using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The position of the runner was a function of the basin height (H). The maximum efficiency (44.15%) was established when the runner was located at 60% of H. The angular velocity associated with the maximum efficiency was 14 rad/s.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.