2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of current and energy X-ray measurement methods in contrast media detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, Y 2 and Y 3 are equal to 0 1 and 0 2 in previous papers. [1][2][3][4] With ÈðtÞ, the iodine contrast CðtÞ is estimated as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, Y 2 and Y 3 are equal to 0 1 and 0 2 in previous papers. [1][2][3][4] With ÈðtÞ, the iodine contrast CðtÞ is estimated as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. As previously described, [1][2][3][4] the estimation of iodine thickness was performed using the x-ray events of two energy ranges: 28-33 and 34-39 keV. The purpose of unfolding measured currents is the estimation of x-ray events in these two energy ranges.…”
Section: Unfolding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of energy information of X-rays gives following advantages: (1) X-ray absorption by iodine is observed in the same way despite of the X-ray tube voltage and of the thickness of the subject (beam hardening effect free) [2]; (2) CT value of iodine is nearly twofold higher than the one obtained by current measurement CT [5]; (3) dose exposure is reduced to 1/2 to 1/3 when an X-ray filter, such as a lanthanum filter, is applied at the exit of X-ray tube [1].…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) When compared with the conventional current measurement method of CT, the energy-resolved CT has nearly double the contrast obtained with an iodine contrast agent. 2) This means that only half the amount of iodine contrast agent is necessary when using the energy-resolved CT method and results in the lessening of the potential side effects incurred with the use of iodine contrast agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%