Introduction: A grading system for pulmonary adenocarcinoma has not been established. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology panel evaluated a set of histologic criteria associated with prognosis aimed at establishing a grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: A grading system based on the predominant and high-grade patterns is practical and prognostic for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Histological subtyping of pulmonary adenocarcinoma has recently been updated based on predominant pattern, but data on reproducibility are required for validation. This study first assesses reproducibility in subtyping adenocarcinomas and then assesses further the distinction between invasive and non-invasive (wholly lepidic) pattern of adenocarcinoma, among an international group of pulmonary pathologists. Two ring studies were performed using a micro-photographic image-based method, evaluating selected images of lung adenocarcinoma histologic patterns. In the first study, 26 pathologists reviewed representative images of typical and ‘difficult’ histologic patterns. A total number of scores for the typical patterns combined (n = 94) and the difficult cases (n = 21) were 2444 and 546, respectively. The mean kappa score (± s.d.) for the five typical patterns combined and for difficult cases were 0.77 ± 0.07 and 0.38 ± 0.14, respectively. Although 70% of the observers identified 12–65% of typical images as single pattern, highest for solid and least for micropapillary, recognizing the predominant pattern was achieved in 92–100%, of the images except for micropapillary pattern (62%). For the second study on invasion, identified as a key problem area from the first study, 28 pathologists submitted and reviewed 64 images representing typical as well as ‘difficult’ examples. The kappa for typical and difficult cases was 0.55 ± 0.06 and 0.08 ± 0.02, respectively, with consistent subdivision by the same pathologists into invasive and non-invasive categories, due to differing interpretation of terminology defining invasion. In pulmonary adenocarcinomas with classic morphology, which comprise the majority of cases, there is good reproducibility in identifying a predominant pattern and fair reproducibility distinguishing invasive from in-situ (wholly lepidic) patterns. However, more precise definitions and better education on interpretation of existing terminology are required to improve recognition of purely in-situ disease, this being an area of increasing importance.
The recent development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to promising advances in the treatment of patients with NSCLC and SCLC with advanced or metastatic disease. Most ICIs target programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis with the aim of restoring antitumor immunity. Multiple clinical trials for ICIs have evaluated a predictive value of PD-L1 protein expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) by immunohistochemistry (IHC), for which different assays with specific IHC platforms were applied. Of those, some PD-L1 IHC assays have been validated for the prescription of the corresponding agent for firstor second-line treatment. However, not all laboratories are equipped with the dedicated platforms, and many laboratories have set up in-house or laboratory-developed tests that are more affordable than the generally expensive clinical trialvalidated assays. Although PD-L1 IHC test is now deployed in most pathology laboratories, its appropriate implementation and interpretation are critical as a predictive biomarker and can be challenging owing to the multiple antibody clones and platforms or assays available and given the typically small size of samples provided. Because many articles have been published since the issue of the IASLC Atlas of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Testing in Lung Cancer, this review by the IASLC Pathology Committee provides updates on the indications of ICIs for lung cancer in 2019 and discusses important considerations on preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical aspects of PD-L1 IHC testing, including specimen type, validation of assays, external quality assurance, and training.
We previously demonstrated that the transcription factor NF-E2-related factor2 (Nrf2), expressed abundantly in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, plays a pivotal role in the proliferation and chemoresistance of NSCLC. Here we show that Nrf2-mediated NSCLC cell proliferation is dually regulated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and an Nrf2 repressor protein Keap1 (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1). NSCLC cells expressing wild-type EGFR and Keap1 genes show enhanced proliferation on stimulation with EGFR ligand under non-stress conditions. Exposure to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) enhanced cell proliferation by modification of the Nrf2/Keap1 interaction. Although EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) inhibited the proliferation of these cells, exposure to CSE attenuated its efficacy. In NSCLC cells with Keap1 gene mutations, Nrf2 was constitutively activated owing to dysfunction of Keap1 and cells proliferated independently of EGFR signaling. Furthermore, EGFR-TKI was unable to inhibit their proliferation. In NSCLC cells with EGFR gene mutations, Nrf2 was constitutively activated by EGFR signaling. In these cells, proliferation was largely dependent on the EGFR signaling pathway. Although these cells were highly sensitive to EGFR-TKI, exposure to CSE or knockdown of Keap1 mRNA reduced sensitivity to EGFR-TKI. We found a case of NSCLC showing resistance to EGFR-TKI despite having EGFR-TKI-sensitive EGFR gene mutation because of dysfunctional mutation in Keap1 gene. Results indicate that oxidative stress reduces the anticancer effects of EGFR-TKI in wild-type Keap1 NSCLC cells. Analysis of Keap1 dysfunction may become a novel molecular marker to predict resistance to EGFR-TKI in NSCLC cells having EGFR-TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations. Finally, as the downstream molecule of both EGFR and Keap1 signaling, Nrf2 is an important molecular target for the treatment of NSCLC, where cells have mutations in EGFR, KRAS or Keap1 genes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.