2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03388-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cranial ultrasound and MRI for detecting BRAIN injury in extremely preterm infants and correlation with neurological outcomes at 1 and 3 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, some authors use the "worst" cUS of a limited number of examinations, and more recent studies emphasize the importance of a discharge and/or TEA examination. 27,37,53 With regard to brain injury, for a low-grade GMH-IVH there are increasing data about the possible adverse effect on outcome through school age. 54 As the diagnosis was based on cUS in these studies, one should take into account that subtle white matter injury and (small) cerebellar hemorrhages will have been missed and their effect on outcome may play a more important role than the low-grade IVH.…”
Section: Prediction Of Neurodevelopmental Outcome Using Cus Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, some authors use the "worst" cUS of a limited number of examinations, and more recent studies emphasize the importance of a discharge and/or TEA examination. 27,37,53 With regard to brain injury, for a low-grade GMH-IVH there are increasing data about the possible adverse effect on outcome through school age. 54 As the diagnosis was based on cUS in these studies, one should take into account that subtle white matter injury and (small) cerebellar hemorrhages will have been missed and their effect on outcome may play a more important role than the low-grade IVH.…”
Section: Prediction Of Neurodevelopmental Outcome Using Cus Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at present MRI remains impractical as a routine screening tool, and at times this technique identifies subtle lesions with unproven significance. Sequential cUS during the neonatal period can reliably identify many brain abnormalities enabling the prediction of abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes at 1 year and 3 years of postnatal age (5)(6)(7). Thus, cUS remains the universal screening tool to identify and monitor brain injury in preterm neonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine neonatal brain imaging via ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are usually evaluated through visual qualitative assessment of the images which leads to loss of information and variability among observers (3)(4)(5)(6). To improve reproducibility in assessment of brain growth, composite and global scores have been developed that include a combination of subjective items and objective measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table of predicted US TBV in cm3 based on BPD (mm), anteroposterior axis (mm), and vertical axis (mm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%