2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroimaging of the Preterm Brain: Review and Recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more preterm an infant is at birth, the higher the risk of brain injury, such that every extra day in utero is of benefit in minimizing events leading to injury, as long as both the in utero environment and the fetus themself is healthy (Ophelders et al, 2020;Cheong et al, 2021). The typical pattern of brain injury experienced by preterm neonates is well described and includes intraventricular hemorrhage, venous infarction, periventricular echogenicity and leukomalacia, post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation, and hypoxic ischemic injury (Inder et al, 2021;Ortinau and Neil, 2015). However, only the more severe lesions evident on neuroimaging translate into longer term outcomes, with environmental factors exerting a greater influence on outcomes over time, especially in those with milder brain injury on imaging (Jansen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Brain Injury In Preterm Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more preterm an infant is at birth, the higher the risk of brain injury, such that every extra day in utero is of benefit in minimizing events leading to injury, as long as both the in utero environment and the fetus themself is healthy (Ophelders et al, 2020;Cheong et al, 2021). The typical pattern of brain injury experienced by preterm neonates is well described and includes intraventricular hemorrhage, venous infarction, periventricular echogenicity and leukomalacia, post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation, and hypoxic ischemic injury (Inder et al, 2021;Ortinau and Neil, 2015). However, only the more severe lesions evident on neuroimaging translate into longer term outcomes, with environmental factors exerting a greater influence on outcomes over time, especially in those with milder brain injury on imaging (Jansen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Brain Injury In Preterm Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cystic periventricular leukomalacia is well diagnosed by both ultrasound and MRI. On the contrary, punctuate WM lesions representative of gliosis are only delineated by MRI scans as ischemic signals and less frequently hemorrhagic [11]. Finally, diffusive and excessive signal intensity of the WM may also be described in T2-weighted images.…”
Section: Conventional Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children 2022, 9, 356 2 of 17 MRI studies in the early 2000s have identified white matter (WM) signal abnormalities as nodular periventricular leukomalacia in favor of gliosis lesions and predictive of neurodevelopmental outcomes [1,9,10]. Therefore, cerebral MRI at term equivalent age has been suggested to become part of a routine imaging protocol in PT [11]. Furthermore, advanced MRI techniques have brought great insights in PT brain development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premature birth impacts callosal growth and disturbs WM connectivity and the myelination process ( 20 ). Such alteration of callosal growth and microstructural disorganization has been correlated with a worse cognitive and motor outcome than a control population ( 20 , 22 , 25 ). In a cohort of very preterm infants <30 weeks, the majority of survivors did not have severe brain injuries but an altered biparietal diameter and IHD ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cerebellum is an area of particular interest in preterm infants because of its acute growth during the third trimester of the pregnancy. Cerebellar diameter at term equivalent age seems to be independently related to cognitive and motor outcomes ( 25 , 27 ). This finding was also supported by the correlation between cerebellar abnormal dimensions and motor function at 7 years old ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%