2015
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.2828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional and ultrasound‑guided needle biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: a randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of Szlubowski et al 21 in a group of 41 patients with suspected sarcoidosis, the diagnosis was confirmed in 85.7% of the cases. In the study of Gnass et al 23 (performed with participation of our team), the sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS -FNA were 0.79 and 0.8, respectively, and of EUS -FNA-0.88 and 0.89, respectively. In the study of Szlubowski et al 21 the same technique was used, but a different pathology team assessed cytological smears.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study of Szlubowski et al 21 in a group of 41 patients with suspected sarcoidosis, the diagnosis was confirmed in 85.7% of the cases. In the study of Gnass et al 23 (performed with participation of our team), the sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS -FNA were 0.79 and 0.8, respectively, and of EUS -FNA-0.88 and 0.89, respectively. In the study of Szlubowski et al 21 the same technique was used, but a different pathology team assessed cytological smears.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the study of Szlubowski et al 21 the same technique was used, but a different pathology team assessed cytological smears. In the study of Gnass et al, 23 as in the present study, patients were diagnosed in the same endoscopy unit. The study of Gnass et al 23 , the endoscopic and pathology teams gained more experience in the technique, which resulted in much higher sensitivity of the procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent investigations have proved a significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy of ultrasound−guided TBNA whether from esophagus or great airways versus conventional one, in the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis which is manifested with hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy. In that way, Annema et al 7 suggest EUS-FNA as the next diagnostic procedure after nondiagnostic bronchoscopy and Gnass et al 8 , on the basis of the results obtained by comparison of conventional and US needle biopsy technics, suggest EUS-FNA as the method of choice for patients with suspicion of sarcoidosis. Ribeiro et al 9 suggest EBUS-TBNA as the first diagnostic line, while Navani et al 10 suggest EBUS-TBNA in combination with the standard, initial bronchoscopic technics (EBB and TBB) as the first line of examination for patients with suspicion of sarcoidosis and intrathoracic lymphadenopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stage I/II sarcoidosis, EBUS-TBNA was associated with a sensitivity and accuracy of approximately 80 % [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%