2017
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.3934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The endosonography-guided needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis – randomized study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic yield was higher for endoscopic ultrasound compared with EBUS, but this was not statistically significant. 100 These observations were further confirmed by a retrospective analysis. 101 The addition of a rapid on-site evaluation to EBUS-TBNA did not seem to increase the diagnostic yield, whereas a rapid on-site evaluation could greatly increase the diagnostic performance of cTBNA.…”
Section: Ultrasound Techniques In the Diagnosis Of Sarcoidosismentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The diagnostic yield was higher for endoscopic ultrasound compared with EBUS, but this was not statistically significant. 100 These observations were further confirmed by a retrospective analysis. 101 The addition of a rapid on-site evaluation to EBUS-TBNA did not seem to increase the diagnostic yield, whereas a rapid on-site evaluation could greatly increase the diagnostic performance of cTBNA.…”
Section: Ultrasound Techniques In the Diagnosis Of Sarcoidosismentioning
confidence: 66%
“…59 Data from direct comparisons between standard and endosonographic techniques in patients with sarcoidosis stage I/II documented an overall supremacy of the imaging-assisted procedures as single tool, in the absence of a significant difference between EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA, as recently suggested. 66,67 However, in a controlled trial randomizing patients to undergo c-TBNA or EBUS-TBNA, a similar diagnostic yield was found between c-TBNA combined with TBLB and EBB and EBUS-TBNA combined with TBLB, highlighting the importance of airways and lung parenchymal biopsies in improving the chance of detecting granulomas, although slightly increasing complication rates and time. 68 Moreover, this also implies that the conventional techniques can still be considered as valuable diagnostic tools, especially in centers with limited resources, where ultrasound-guided technology is not yet available.…”
Section: Diagnostic Workupmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In 2017, Kocon et al [62] published a prospective randomized study to assess the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA, and to compare them with standard diagnostic techniques (such as EBB, TBLB and cTBNA). The authors stated that EUS-FNA had the highest diagnostic yield (75%) as a standalone test when compared with EBUS-TBNA (62%), but the combination of the two endosonographic techniques showed a diagnostic yield of 80%, whereas the combination of standard bronchoscopic procedures led to a diagnostic yield of 64%.…”
Section: Recent Bronchoscopic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%